Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Category: News

Pulitzer Prize winning culinary writer Jonathan Gold eloquently advocates for AB376, which would ban California sales of shark fins, in the Opinion section of the Sunday, August 7th Los Angeles Times . “There is no sustainable source of shark’s fin,” wrote Gold, noting that “nearly a third of shark species are approaching the point of extinction.”

Read Jonathon’s Op-Ed

Help Save Our Sharks

  • Take Action on AB 376Use our Action Alert to call your Senator and send them an e-mail urging their YES vote on AB 376.
  • Attend the Rally to Save Our Sharks on 8/13
    Please join Heal the Bay and other leading environmental groups on Saturday, August 13, 10am, at the Manhattan Beach Pier to tell our State Senators to stop the sale of shark fins and vote YES on AB 376! Shark costumes are encouraged!

Gold, dubbed “L.A.’s most adventurous eater” by The New Yorker, is the older brother of Heal the Bay President Mark Gold. For the past 25 years he’s specialized in writing about ethnic cuisine, spending significant time in restaurants that serve Cantonese food, including shark’s fin.

In his op-edJonathan notes that Chinese culinary culture has proven to be resilient over the centuries, able “to withstand the absence of sea-turtle skirt and bear paw, whose preparation obsessed the earliest Chinese gourmets. There is no third way with shark’s fin – we either stop eating it because we choose to preserve the species, or we stop eating it because soon there will be none left to eat.”

Read Jonathan’s entire op-ed (new window).

Shark Fin Soup (Illustration by Wes Bausmith / Los Angeles Times)
Illustration by Wes Bausmith / Los Angeles Times



A small town in Provence declared smoking off limits on a stretch of its beachfront, proclaiming itself the first non-smoking beach not only in France, but Europe.

According to the Associated Press, the smoking ban came into effect earlier this summer in La Ciotat, and compliance among the public at the packed beach has been strong. “We don’t stop smokers from going elsewhere, but this one we want to reserve for nonsmokers, for mothers and children so they can make sand castles and not cigarette butt castles,” Deputy Mayor for the Environment Noel Collura told the AP.

Cigarette butts remain the No. 1 item picked up by volunteers at Heal the Bay beach cleanups, despite the fact that Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Long Beach and Malibu have banned smoking on the beach. A typical cigarette butt can take anywhere from 18 months to 10 years to decompose, depending on conditions. Cigarette butts contain the chemicals filtered from cigarettes that leach into waterways and water supplies.

Read the story at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44002823/ns/travel-destination_travel/

Photo courtesy Jacques Brinon  /  AP



Buy one of California’s newly-designed Whale Tail® specialty license plates and support Heal the Bay’s cleanup and education programs. Plus, be among the first 1,000 ocean lovers to get the new Ecoplate and pay $25 instead of $50, or get $25 off a personalized plate. Each of the first 1,000 to purchase one of these license plates will also receive two tickets to visit one of several California destination attractions.

But the best reward is: Each purchase of these new plates benefits Heal the Bay and supports our award-winning beach cleanup and education programs. We use these funds to support the 600+ cleanups we conduct each year along the L.A. County Coastline and to educate our volunteers on how to protect the ocean environment from pollution.

Learn more and purchase a new Whale Tail® plate.



The Twilight Dance Series partners with Heal the Bay on Thursday, August 4, 7-10 p.m., with Nelson Marquez & the Moderators and Tutu Sweeney & the Brothers Band set to perform a free concert at Santa Monica Pier.

Show your appreciation and “Protect What You Love!” by texting GIVE2HEAL to 20222 which will donate $5 to help keep our beaches safe, clean and healthy.

Learn more about the August 4th concert.



Does the scene in this photo count as algal impairment under the Clean Water Act?  I’m just curious if the folks in Florida that are attempting to blow up the Clean Water Act over proposed nutrient standards would agree that this is impairment.  After all, the kids appear to be enjoying themselves, and after all, isn’t that what recreational water contact is all about? Heal the Bay gets in a lot of fights on the definition of algal impairment with regulators and the regulated community.  When you see pictures like the ones from Qingdao in China, it makes you realize that the regulated community isn’t even willing to come part way on the issue.  If there is a Karenia bloom in Florida that poses a respiratory health risk to beach goers, is that an impairment?  If Malibu Creek has an antifreeze algae bloom that covers the entire creek for a quarter mile, is that impairment? The regulated community may argue that 10% algal cover for  30% of the time isn’t impairment (a definition previously used by some at EPA). But how can they look at pictures like those in China, Florida and Malibu Creek and not offer nutrient reduction recommendations?

Harmful algal blooms are a growing problem that are choking our nation’s rivers and coastal waters with devastating impacts to aquatic ecosystems.  Yet, the EPA and most states are still arguing over the right thing to do and completing an endless series of studies.  They should be requiring aggressive reductions in nutrient discharge loadings (nitrogen and phosphorus) and concentrations, and they should have done it years ago.

Add a comment to this post»



It’s time for Los Angeles to move beyond coal power. LADWP (Los Angeles Department of Water and Power) is considering a plan to sell its stake by 2014 in the Navajo Generating Station, which is, according to the Sierra Club, one of the largest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants in the entire country. The LADWP is asking for customer feedback on this plan.

Please take two minutes and complete the LADWP survey. Make sure to mark moving beyond coal as a high priority.

Photo: Navajo Generating Station via Wikipedia



On Thursday, the California Supreme Court issued a decision reversing a previous Court of Appeal decision that ruled the City of Manhattan Beach should have conducted a full Environmental Impact Report to inform their plastic bag ban ordinance adopted back in July 2008.

A group of plastic bag manufacturers known as Save the Plastic Bag had opposed the City of Manhattan Beach plastic bag ban, arguing that switching to paper bags would actually increase the volume in landfills and have other adverse environmental impacts. The California Supreme Court reversed a previous decision by the Court of Appeal (who sided with Save the Plastic Bag) concluding “substantial evidence and common sense support the city’s determination that its ordinance would have no significant environmental effect.”

This ruling now paves the way for cities considering similar policies to move forward. The decision sends a strong message that these frivolous lawsuits brought by polluting interests against environmental laws under the guise of the California Environmental Quality Act are a waste of time and money.

To read more about the case, see Mark Gold’s blog post, “Sweet Justice.”

Photo Natalie Burdick



Attention shoppers! Effective Friday, July 1, 2011, large supermarkets and pharmacies in Los Angeles County’s unincorporated areas are not allowed to distribute single use plastic
bags.

More Information

Share

Questions?

  • Call 310.451.1500, x116

Approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on November 16, 2010, the ban prohibits the distribution of single-use plastic shopping bags
at grocery stores, convenience stores and pharmacies in unincorporated
areas, which encompass some 1 million residents and 65% of the county.

The ban is intended to promote the use of reusable bags over single use plastic and paper carryout bags in order to reduce the negative economic and environmental impacts associated with single use bags.

The county is now the largest municipality in the nation to ban plastic
bags and has spurred a substantial amount of interest in this issue with many jurisdictions are contemplating similar actions. Some cities within Los Angeles County who have already passed similar ordinances are: Malibu, Long Beach, Santa Monica, and Calabasas.

Heal the Bay has led the legislative fight to enact a bag ban for
more than five years as part of its ongoing efforts to tackle plastic
pollution in California seas and neighborhoods.

Learn more! (on this page)


FAQ’s about the L.A. County Bag Ban

Why ban bags now?

  • Californians use more than 19 billion plastic grocery and merchandise bags each year, roughly 552 bags per person. This usage generates 147,038 tons of unnecessary waste — enough to stretch around the globe over 250 times.
  • Californians throw away over 600 plastic bags per second.
  • California taxpayers spend millions to collect and landfill plastic bag waste each year. That figure does not include external costs, e.g. resource extraction and depletion, quality of life issues, economic loss due to plastic bag litter.
  • U.S. consumers use 100 billion plastic bags annually, which are all made from fossil fuels.

Where does the ban apply?

The ban would include neighborhoods in Los Angeles County unincorporated areas. The areas that are not part of the 88 cities considered to be unincorporated L.A. County. More than 65% of Los Angeles County is unincorporated. For the 1 million people living in these areas, the Board of Supervisors and County Departments provide the municipal services.

Are all plastic carry out bags banned?

Yes. Plastic carryout bags are any bag made predominantly of plastic (either petroleum or a biologically-based source, such as corn or other plants) provided to a customer at the cash register.

Will I get a paper bag instead?

During manufacturing, both paper and plastic bags emit global warming gases, create water pollution and use raw materials and energy. Paper is not the answer. If you didn’t bring a reusable bag and you must have a bag, you will have to buy a paper bag for 10 cents.

  • The paper bags must be 100% recyclable and contain a minimum of 40% postconsumer recycled material and display the word “Recyclable” in a highly visible manner on the outside of the bag.

What do I put my green beans and meat in?

The ban does not include produce bags or product bags. That means any bag without handles used exclusively to carry produce, meats, bread or other food items to the cash register, will not be included in the ban.

What happens to the 10 cents collected by the store?

Monies collected by a store for paper bags will be retained by the store and may be used only for:

  • Costs associated with complying with the requirements of the ban
  • Actual costs of providing recyclable paper carryout bags
  • Costs associated with a store’s educational materials or education campaign encouraging the use of reusable bags

What if I can’t afford reusable bags?

All stores must provide bags free of charge to any customer participating either in the California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children or in the Supplemental Food Program

What stores are covered by the ban?

Hopefully you will make the choice to use reusable bags everywhere, but plastic carry out bags will no longer be available at any of the following retail establishments located within the unincorporated area of the County:

  • Supermarkets
  • Large retail pharmacies
  • Liquor stores and food marts

Why Replace Plastic Grocery Bags With Reusable Bags?

  • Each year, approximately 6 billion plastic bags are consumed in Los Angeles County. This is equivalent to 600 bags per person per year.
  • Approximately 150,000 tons of plastic bags are disposed by Los Angeles County residents each year.
  • Disposable bags cost our cities up to 17 cents per bag for disposal.
    Plastic bags are made from fossil fuels. Americans use over 380 billion bags every year, wasting this precious resource.
  • Alternatives such as reusable bags are readily available and affordable.
  • Some areas of the Pacific Ocean contain six times more plastic debris than zooplankton (the fundamental base of our food chain.) These tiny pieces of plastic are eaten by zooplankton and move up the food chain, potentially presenting health risks for humans.

Benefits of Implementing Widespread Use of Reusable Bags

  • Significant cost savings to taxpayers – less money spent on litter cleanup, enforcement, prevention
  • Fewer plastic bags littering our community
  • Fewer impacts to the marine environment (marine wildlife, such as sea turtles and whales ingest littered plastic bags, that they mistake for food)
  • Fewer natural resources consumed


As most everyone knows by now, the California Coastal Commission bravely voted 8-4 Thursday against the Edge’s proposal for a compound of mansions overlooking the Pacific in Malibu.  The highly controversial project from the U2 guitarist would have caused substantial damage to environmentally sensitive habitat area and did not include plans to reduce polluted runoff or treat and dispose of sewage generated onsite.  Clearly, the developers’ offer of $1 million to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for trail access and land conservation was not enough to sway the commissionvote.

The Los Angeles Times quoted Peter Douglas, the commission’s iconic director, as saying:  “In 38 years of this commission’s existence, this is one of the three worst projects that I’ve seen in terms of environmental devastation. It’s a contradiction in terms — you can’t be serious about being an environmentalist and pick this location” given the effects on habitat, land formation, scenic views and water quality. 

Although we raised concerns about the Edge’s proposed development, I disagree with Douglas’ statement on its scale relative to the projects considered by the commission through history. In fact, I consider it to be the second most environmentally damaging project voted on by the commission Thursday — Malibu Valley Farms is far worse.

Read more & comment» (new window)



There’s a special project making a mini tour of Southern California next week. The Clean Oceans Project is showing off new technology that converts waste plastic into oil without toxic emissions or byproducts.

The project is making a stop on Tuesday, the 21st, at noon at Venice’s Electric Lodge, a solar-powered visual and performing arts center, where you’ll have a chance to catch the demonstration. Engineers at Blest Co. LTD of Japan developed a processing system that vaporizes and then distills the plastic back into petroleum-based liquid fuels.

Want to check out the process in action? To reserve your space at the demonstration, contact Captain Jim Holm at capthomer@thecleanoceansproject.org or call 831-251-4656.

Photo: woodlywonderworks via Flickr