Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Category: News

Today’s Thank You Thursday shout-out goes to all of the amazing organizations that helped to make our Volunteer Party on Monday truly special.

Thank you Bodega Wine Bar for hosting the party again this year. We love the space, the food, and your friendly staff is the best!

We had some awesome raffle items donated this year! Our big ticket items came from ZJ Boarding House, which graciously gave an epic skate deck and two board and wetsuit rentals, along with YogaWorks, with a 6-month membership pass! We were able to reward winning volunteers with cool swag from Poseidon Paddle & Surf, El Porto Surfboards, District Skate Shop, and REI.

Heal the Bay volunteer party cookiesThe Trapeze School of New York and Perfect Day Surf Camp gave certificates for unforgettable experiences for a couple lucky raffle winners. Thanks to all of our special eats sponsors, Locanda del Lago, Pizza Antica, Hamburger Habit, Pitfire Pizza and Baja Buds, who supplied redeemable gift certificates.

And thank you, Becker’s Bakery, for donating 100 of your star sugar cookies for our volunteers to decorate and enjoy. Our A-List volunteers got the star quality treatment, all thanks to a little help from our friends! Thank you to all of our sponsors for making the evening unforgettable.



With heavy storms forecast for the weekend we take a look at what all that rain means for our local beaches and ocean:

What does the recent storm mean for our local environment?

In a time of severe drought, storms will help recharge our local aquifers and increase water supply. That’s a good thing. But all the rainfall also has a downside, namely polluted runoff hitting our local beaches and ocean.

Where does all the storm-related runoff go?

After a big rainstorm, L.A. County’s 5,000-mile stormdrain system and local waterbodies carry runoff straight to the ocean. Engineers in the 1930s and ‘40s designed the stormdrain system to prevent area flooding. L.A. is like a giant concrete bowl titled to the sea, with thousands of miles of freeways, parking lots and other impervious surfaces draining to the beach.

With such a severe drought, couldn’t we make better use of all that water dumped in the ocean?

Yes. Sending urban runoff to the sea is a huge waste of a precious resource. Los Angeles imports costly and increasingly scarce water from Northern California and the Colorado River. Storm water — if captured in groundwater basins, cisterns and other devices — could provide a safe, more secure and less costly source of drinking water. Heal the Bay is now working on a public funding measure to support regional multi-benefit stormwater capture and reuse projects.

What are the impacts of stormwater on our local beaches and ocean?

Urban runoff is the No. 1 source of pollution on our beaches. As rainfall runs through the streets and stormdrains, it picks up harmful contaminants along the way – trash, pet waste, chemicals, fertilizers and metals. All that gross stuff winds up in the ocean and along the shoreline.

In what way do local residents contribute to the runoff problem?

Among many items, Angelenos add to debris buildup by dropping nearly 1 million cigarette butts on the ground each month, according to L.A. County Department of Public Works estimates in 2010. Citizens walk a dog without picking up the droppings more than 82,000 times per month, and they hose off driveways and sidewalks into storm drains more than 415,000 times each month.

Why isn’t the runoff treated?

Some cities have combined stormwater and sewer systems, but Los Angeles has completely separate water drainage systems. The sheer volume of runoff generated in the nation’s second-largest city makes it difficult to treat.

How much runoff are we actually talking about?

After a single powerful storm, up to 10 billion gallons of contaminated water and trash flow daily through our storm drains, creeks and rivers into the Santa Monica and San Pedro Bays. That’s the equivalent of 100 Rose Bowls filled with polluted water.

What does all this runoff to do the ocean and the animals that call it home?

Countless animals each year die from ingesting trash or getting entangled in manmade debris. Seawater laden with chemicals and metals makes it harder for local marine life to thrive and reproduce.

What about the human health impacts?

Beachgoers who come in contact with polluted water face a much higher risk of contracting illnesses such as stomach flu, ear infections, upper respiratory infections and skin rashes. A UCLA epidemiology study found that swimmers are twice as likely to get sick from swimming in front of a flowing storm drain than from recreating in open water.

How can ocean lovers stay safe after rainfall?

  • Wait at least 72 hours before entering the water for most beaches and avoid storm drain impacted and enclosed beaches for 5 to 10 days
  • Stay away from storm drains, piers and enclosed beaches with poor circulation
  • Go to Heal the Bay’s beachreportcard.org to get latest water quality grades and updates

What about the economic impacts?

People make nearly 50 million visits to Santa Monica Bay beaches each year. And the coastal economy in Los Angeles County generates more than $20 billion in goods and services each year. Polluted water and debris-laden beaches put these economic drivers at risk.

What can people do to reduce the impact of runoff-related pollution?

  • Dispose of litter properly. Keeping trash out of the street, keeps trash out of the sea. Cigarette butts and Styrofoam pieces are the two most frequently found items at our beach cleanups.
  • Rip up your lawn. Nearly half of our water is used to care for our lawns. Not only is it a waste of water in an arid climate, it contributes to poor water quality due to pesticides and fertilizers.
  • Keep rainwater on site. Many cities offer rebates to homeowners who install rain barrels or cisterns, which capture and infiltrate rainfall for later use around the home.

What can I do to reduce the immediate impact of all the storm debris washing onto our beaches?

Consdier joining Heal the Bay’s new Storm Response Team, a rugged squad of volunteers and staff ready to give some TLC to our most trash-impacted beaches. After big storms, the crew leaps into and removes debris and catalogues it for our ongoing stormwater advocacy efforts.

Want to get a graphic, real-time look at storm debris impacting our shoreline? Check out this nighttime video of runoff hitting the beach at Bay Street in Santa Monica



More Information

THE ISSUE

Many don’t realize it, but Santa Monica Bay may soon be opened up to oil drilling

The City of Hermosa Beach currently has a moratorium in place that prohibits oil drilling. After years of legal battles, a settlement was reached between E&B Natural Resources and the City of Hermosa Beach that could potentially allow the community to be opened up to oil drilling by putting the moratorium up for reconsideration. Hermosa Beach residents will vote next March on a ballot measure to allow slant-drilling into the Bay. E&B Natural Resources wants to erect an 87-foot drilling rig and up to 34 wells on a 1.3-acre plot in a residential neighborhood, extracting up to 8,000 barrels of oil each day by slant-drilling under the seafloor and surrounding beach communities.

If voters repeal the existing moratorium on drilling, the City would have to pay $3.5 million to E&B, and the company would pursue permitting for the proposed oil drilling operation. If voters uphold the moratorium, drilling would be barred. But the city would have to pay $17.5 million to E&B under a complex settlement brokered by past city councils.

THE PROBLEM

Oil drilling off Hermosa Beach poses significant environmental and economic risks throughout the Bay

An oil spill isn’t restricted to city limits. With nearly 50 million annual visits to Bay beaches and a coastal economy worth over $10 billion, a spill off Hermosa Beach would be a financial and ecologic nightmare for all of Los Angeles. As the Deepwater Horizon disaster showed, it can take years for local ecosystems, economies and psyches to recover from a spill.

Oil drilling off Hermosa Beach would jeopardize public health

With the project site in close proximity to schools, parks, businesses and popular beaches, public health impacts are a major concern. Approximately 49% of the City’s residents live within 1/2 mile of the drilling site. Drilling near homes and pipes placed along busy streets put residents and visitors at risk from explosions, toxic flares and air and noise pollution.

Oil drilling off Hermosa sets a dangerous precedent for further exploitation of our Bay

Thanks to the hard work of Heal the Bay and its partners, there are no oil drilling operations in the Bay. Lifting the moratorium and allowing drilling to proceed in Hermosa is like opening Pandora’s Box. Other oil and gas companies may be emboldened to pursue similar drilling projects, rolling back years of hard-fought coastal protections.

THE SOLUTION

Uphold the moratorium

Voters naturally worry about paying off an oil company $17.5 million because of a bad agreement negotiated in the past. But Hermosa Beach is financially sound and has more than $6.2 million already set aside to cover the settlement cost. It’s better to settle a bad debt now than mortgage the future health of our Bay for decades to come.

Advocate for policies to prevent future slant drilling along entire Los Angeles coast

Our policy staff is now documenting the history of oil drilling moratoriums in all Santa Monica Bay cities and assessing energy policies in bordering cities. We are also using our technical expertise to evaluate risks to the community and environment. Heal the Bay successfully fought to enact the current moratorium in 1995, but now seeks a regional approach to stop drilling.

Worried about the prospect of oil drilling in our Bay? Sign up to stay informed.



Staff scientist Amanda Griesbach says new guidelines will make it easier to fix troubled beaches.

As a water quality scientist, I get a lot of questions about local beach water quality, sources of pollution, and public health risks. Sometimes, providing a definitive answer can be tough. There are a lot of variables when it comes to figuring out what’s going on at a particular site — location, time of year, and the type of beach (enclosed, open ocean or stormdrain impacted). When you factor in random bacteria distribution in a given location, the science behind beach water quality may not seem so black and white.

Under state law, weekly monitoring is required between April 1 and October 31 for all coastal beaches adjacent to a flowing stormdrain (or known point source) that receive 50,000 or more annual visitors.  The weekly results from a single 100 mL sample of beach water (about the size of a small cup of coffee) are used to make and inform important public health decisions. But challenges loom when analyzing that sample for harmful bacteria and taking corrective action.

For example, current testing methods fail to differentiate among various fecal sources, such as bird, dog or human. Obviously, the first priority is just establishing that there are bacteria in the water. But if we want to abate harmful micro-organisms, we need to know specifically where they are coming from.

And we’re also trying to get more rapid forms of testing. Right now, it takes about 18-24 hours to process a sample. Rapid methods now being developed would give us a snapshot of a particular beach as soon as 4-6 hours, which would be more protective of public health. But it could be years before these new methods are incorporated into state and/or federal beach monitoring standards.

Heal the Bay has always been proactive when it comes to improving beach water quality, and thankfully the State Water Board has supported improving California’s coastal beach water quality through its Clean Beaches Initiative Grant Program.

The Board launched the CBI Grant Program in 2001 in response to the poor water quality and significant exceedances of fecal indicator bacteria along coastal beaches. A Clean Beach Task Force was convened with experts from local agencies, environmental groups, academia, government, and scientific organizations to assist the Board in reviewing beach water improvement project proposals, evaluating their success, and identifying critical beach water quality research needs.

As a member of the task force, I have often found it challenging to decide which water quality improvement efforts are most appropriate and/or effective at a certain beach. The decision becomes even more trying when source identification efforts, protocols, and priorities are inconsistent from beach to beach, from county agency to county agency.

Luckily, the project selection process may be easier in the future, as the State Board recently released a new manual that spells out a clear protocol for tracking bacterial pollution at troubled beaches across the state.

The new set of guidelines – called The California Microbial Source Identification Manual:  A Tiered Approach to Identifying Fecal Pollution Sources to Beaches – is based on the collaborative research efforts of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), Stanford University, UCLA, UCSB and Virginia Tech.

The manual will assist beach managers in identifying sources of fecal bacteria through a step-by-step protocol. The process starts with identifying more obvious potential sources (e.g. large bird population due to uncovered trash bins), as it guides the user through more complex source tracking techniques, including the investigation of a potential sewer/septic leak using genetic markers.

The new source identification manual will not only provide consistency for all future source identification studies, but will allow task force members to make more informed decisions about funding  water quality improvement projects. While the manual may be geared towards beach managers and researchers, it contains background information on potential fecal bacteria sources, mitigation efforts and the CBI Program that the general beachgoing public can benefit from.

I commend the State Board and researchers who worked diligently to complete this manual. We’re now one step closer to having a uniform Beach Program, where the benefits of consistent and efficient monitoring will ultimately lead to strengthened coastal public health protection.

The full manual can be found at:  http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/beaches/cbi_projects/docs/sipp_manual.pdf

 



Heal the Bay president Ruskin Hartley on what it really means to waste water:

On Wednesday I joined Mayor Garcetti, Gov. Brown and members of the President’s Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience at a reception at the Getty House to kick off day-long talks about how the federal government can help communities confront climate change. And today in Fresno, President Obama is unveiling an aid package for communities hit hardest by the drought.

Even as we address immediate needs of drought-stricken communities, we must move beyond short-term aid and invest in a water system for California’s future. And that presents historic opportunities for our work at Heal the Bay. Since 1985, we have been focused on cleaning up pollution in California’s waterways and ocean.  We have had some remarkable successes.  However, many of the state’s rivers and streams still fail to meet clean water standards and much of our groundwater is polluted.

There’s much discussion at the moment about how we “waste” water by dumping it into the ocean. Every time I hear that I cringe. While it is not a waste to let water flow to the ocean (it’s an essential part of the natural system that keeps us alive), it is a waste to dump highly treated water in the ocean that could be reused to off-set dwindling imported supplies.   And we do this every day from countless wastewater treatment plants. One plant alone, Hyperion out by LAX,  flushes 250 million gallons a day of treated wastewater into Santa Monica Bay – equivalent to the water needs of 2 ½ million people. That’s unconscionable waste!

And then there’s stormwater. When it rains, millions of gallons of rain flush through the urban watershed via engineered culverts and channels, picking up pollutants in a rush to the ocean. In a naturally functioning system, much of this would infiltrate into the ground and replenish our aquifers.  Instead we are left with polluted beaches and depleted aquifers. Crazy! 

We cannot make it rain. But we can make much better use of the precious water we have. Today, Heal the Bay is advocating for solutions and investments that make better use of our local water resources: groundwater clean-up, stormwater capture and recharge, and increased recycling. Taken as a package, they will go a long way to cleaning up our rivers, streams, and ocean. And that will make for a healthier bay. I’ll drink to that!



Kirsten James, Heal the Bay’s director of water quality, recently took a trip to China to discuss environmental issues with policymakers in the world’s most populous nation. Here she shares her reflections.

I’m back from China, and breathing a lot easier. I had a fabulous time, but the air pollution is brutal! Last month, the Beijing government invited me to speak to its Water Authority about water issues and regulation in California and share lessons to help inform the development of Beijing’s Water Action Plan.  My trip was a great learning experience, providing an up-close view of Chinese culture and how the nation goes about tackling environmental issues.

Addressing water supply and water quality is no small task for Beijing managers, given that they serve a population of more than 21 million residents. Officials I spoke with repeatedly pointed to population growth as their greatest environmental challenge.  As I described our work to benefit the city of Los Angeles and its 4 million residents, they nodded but said we are on a totally different playing field.  Nonetheless, they seemed keen to investigate how practices used to manage water in California could be introduced to Beijing, such as Total Maximum Daily Loads, other pollution limits and low impact development requirements.

In some respects, Beijing could be considered a step ahead of us in conservation. The city has had success implementing the use of grey water, water metering and price-tiering. Yet those programs might be attributed to an overly strong government hand and more lax public health regulations, which may not be a good thing.

My Chinese colleagues got a good chuckle when I mentioned that people in the greater L.A. region use 187 gallons of water per day on average.  One participant noted that he keeps a bucket of grey water from his sink/laundry to flush his toilet.  Beijing  has significant water recycling initiatives and is seriously exploring indirect potable reuse, so-called “toilet to tap” technologies. Beijing has definitely taken notice of Orange County’s cutting-edge efforts to cleanse wastewater and turn it into drinking water.

My biggest takeaway was seeing how the Chinese government has such a strong role in both hindering and encouraging environmental progress.  For example, if the government owns much of the industry and business, are officials going to make themselves the “responsible party” for cleaning up a groundwater contamination issue or an industrial spill?  However, if the government determines that a new subway line needs to go in within the year and that people shouldn’t drive a certain day of the week to help reduce air pollution, this can be done overnight (no CEQA in China)!

Local municipalities, residents, businesses and public policy advocates in Southern California struggle with the number of agencies dealing with water management. It can be hard to gain consensus and move forward when there are so many silos (e.g., the DWP, MWD and L.A. County Public Works).  Beijing had a similar problem, with 70 different agencies working on water issues.  So in 2004, the government decided the competing unit would all unify into one agency. Voila!

I learned a lot in Beijing to broaden my perspective on water management and hopefully I provided some tools that can help officials there develop and implement a robust water plan.  However, it’s good to be home, drinking clean water from the tap and enjoying a clear blue sky.    



Those lazy days of summer may seem distant, but our Santa Monica Pier Aquarium staff is already preparing an exciting camp season so that families may never face the oft-heard summertime lament: “I’m bored!”

Science Adventures Camp at the Aquarium provides four fun-filled weeks with the fishes – and eels, sea stars, sea horses and jellies – plus way too many other species local to the Santa Monica Bay to name.  It’s a marine science learning experience chock full of games, crafts and laboratory practices, with different marine-themed topics explored each day. Do you have a whale lover in your family? There’s a day devoted to the gentle giants of the ocean. “Toothy Tuesday” is designed for campers to chomp away at the myths and misconseptions surrounding sharks.

Online registration opens Friday, Feb. 14, at 9 a.m. Register campers for a week – or sign up for multiple weeks. Camp weeks are: June 23-27th (kindergarten through 2nd grade); July 7 – 11th (kindergarten through 2nd grade); July 14th-18th (1st – 3rd grades); and July 21st-25th (2nd – 4th grade). Please sign up campers based on the grade they will be entering in the fall of 2014. Need-based scholarships and partial scholarships are available by filling out an application to be considered for this opportunity .

Beginning its third year, Science Adventures camp has grown tremendously in popularity. To avoid disappointment, sign up your budding marine biologists early! You can register here.



Marina del Rey Harbor is the most toxic metropolitan marina in the state. Here, staff scientist Peter Shellenbarger discusses how refinishing boat hulls can reverse the decline.

Update: After a heated discussion that lasted over four hours, the Regional Water Board unanimously approved the amendments to the Marina del Rey Toxics TMDL at its Feb. 6 meeting that will require boat owners to remove copper-based paints from the hulls of their boats (see below for details). Although many boaters expressed concerns over the potential costs of repainting, Regional Board staff reiterated their intent to help secure some grant support. USEPA and others also discussed studies and research by the Department of Toxics Substance Control and others that identified cost-effective, non-toxic paint alternatives. Heal the Bay looks forward to working with the Regional Water Board, the County and the public to help find a sensible path forward for TMDL implementation.

Marina del Rey attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors each year with its breathtaking views and coastal amenities. Its harbor, the centerpiece of the community, is the largest man-made marina in the United States, with mooring space for more than 6,000 small vessels. It also serves as home to many coastal service industries, such as sport fishing, whale watching, and boat racing.

Before the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers created the Harbor in the 1950s, a vast salt marsh covered the area, providing habitat for many aquatic and terrestrial species. Despite the massive transformation of the area over the past 60 years, it remains home to many species that once occupied the wetland, such as sea lions, pelicans, and gulls.

Despite all this animal and human activity, there’s a reason to be concerned about the health of the Marina. Most visitors don’t know that in 2009 Cal EPA found the Harbor to be the most toxic metropolitan marina in the state. Bottom line: Many aquatic species can’t survive in these polluted waters, which also pose a health hazard to humans who regularly come in contact with the water.

Marina del Rey harbor Los Angeles California as seen from LightHawk flightMarina del Rey is now on the Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies for a variety of pollutants (chlordane, copper, lead, zinc, PCBs, DDT, dieldrin and sediment toxicity). Accordingly, many beneficial uses of the Harbor, such as water contact recreation, fishing and marine habitat, are negatively impacted.

In response, the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board established pollution limits in 2005 for the water body to help clean up the Harbor and protect the many uses of its waters. At its Feb. 6 hearing, the Regional Board will reconsider the pollution limits – also known as a TMDL – in order to incorporate the latest science.

The most controversial element of the proposed revision is a requirement for an 85% reduction in copper loading from boats into the water column. Unfortunately, many of the boats in the harbor have their hulls coated in paints that contain high levels of the metal. The copper is effective in keeping barnacles and other unwanted creatures off hulls, but it also can leach into surrounding waters and be a major contributor to overall toxicity.

The new rules would dictate that 85% of the boats now moored in the Harbor would need to refinish their hulls with an alternative product by March 2024. The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board recently adopted a similar requirement to reduce dissolved copper in the water column in the Shelter Island Yacht Basin Copper TMDL.

Understandably, the cost of refinishing hulls is a big concern for boat owners. However, studies indicate that the difference in total lifetime costs for using copper-based hull coatings versus alternative hull coatings is fairly small when routine maintenance schedules are followed. On the positive side, non-copper-based hull coating outlast copper-based products.

To help offset the high upfront costs of switching to non-copper based hull coatings, the Regional Board is exploring grant options for boat owners. The San Diego water board has pursued a similar path to help boat owners.

Marina del Rey is an iconic location in Los Angeles. In order to ensure future generations can fully enjoy this important coastal resource, it is critical that water quality is protected. Heal the Bay’s policy team has determined that updating the Marina del Rey Harbor Toxic Pollutants TMDL to address the copper issue will help protect this resource and the marine life that depends on it.

For more information on copper leaching from boat hulls, you can visit:

http://www.epa.gov/region9/waste/features/safe-paint/index.html

http://www.epa.gov/region9/waste/features/safe-paint/san-diego.html

http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb4/Boater_Fact_Sheet_updated.pdf



Ana Luisa Ahern, Heal the Bay’s Communications Manager, shares her experience flying in a Cessna 210 on an aerial tour of L.A.’s marine protected areas.

Marine Protected Area Garibaldi in Kelp ForestA few weeks ago I had the incredible opportunity to fly in a four-passenger, single engine airplane over L.A.’s beautiful coast. The flight was provided by LightHawk, a nonprofit whose mission is to champion environmental protection through the unique perspective of flight. Mike Sutton, president of the California Fish and Game Commission, served as pilot on this eye-opening journey.

Mike and I were taking Los Angeles Times environmental reporter Tony Barboza and photographer Luis Cinco on an aerial tour of L.A.’s new marine protected areas, or MPAs. Our new MPAs are best viewed at either extreme — below the surface of the ocean or thousands of feet above it. Flying over the ocean on a sunny day provided an incredible view of the thriving kelp forests off the Palos Verdes Peninsula. The view highlighted the beauty and important placement of our new underwater parks in a statewide network of protected places.

Staring down at the expanse of different hues of blue, accentuated by deep brown kelp beds off the Malibu coast near Point Dume, I recalled my recent scuba dives there, both within and just outside of the marine reserve. The contrast was startling. Diving outside of and then in the reserve was akin to stepping out of the desert and into a grove of giant sequoias, surrounded by life. After seeing only a few straggling fish on the first dive, I was awed by the dazzling display of color and variety of species I encountered inside the reserve. Brilliant orange garibaldi darted across my path, a startled swell shark shot off into the deep. Tiny Spanish Shawl nudibranch, those flamboyantly costumed stars of the ocean, swayed in the surge as rockfish stopped to side-eye me in the vast underwater kelp forest. It was like night and day, and the importance of protecting this special place, allowing it to rest and recover in order to thrive, was so beautifully illustrated for me in that moment.

I shared my love for these spots with Tony and Luis on that flight. Mike and I recounted our personal stories about MPAs and the process that brought them to Southern California. We also highlighted the findings of Heal the Bay’s citizen-scientist monitoring program, MPA Watch. The report shows that things haven’t changed all that much for the lives of the fishing community. Life below the surface is on the road to recovery, given a special opportunity to thrive.

Read Tony Barboza’s article about marine sanctuaries in the Los Angeles Times.

Kelp Forests in the ocean in marine protected areas off the Palos Verdes coast



Heal the Bay CEO Ruskin Hartley shares his thoughts on a very good day for the prospect of a statewide ban on plastic bags.

I came back to my desk on Wednesday to a pink Post-It note letting me know that state Sen. Kevin de León’s office had called. The note was simple: Please call back. It was “quite pressing.”  His staff wanted to invite Heal the Bay to speak at a press conference on Friday announcing that state legislative leaders had finally come together and forged a compromise on a new bill that would ban single-use plastic bags across the state.

L.A.-based state Sens. Alex Padilla and de Leon have found a workaround on an issue that helped short-circuit previous legislation: the notion that bans would kill local jobs. The legislative approach revealed Friday includes incentives for manufacturers to retool and build their reusable bag-product lines, thereby investing in green jobs right here in California. 

After seven long years and several Heal the Bay campaigns, it appears that the end is in sight for single-use plastic grocery bags across the state. While SB 270 still needs to make its way through both houses and off the Governor’s desk, we are optimistic — now that  two of the Senate’s heaviest hitters are behind it. (Assemblymember Ricardo Lara also joined the conference, helping solidify the bloc of local Democrats who historically have had concerns with elements of past bag-ban proposals.)

If SB 270 moves forward, California will become the first state in the nation to pass a comprehensive ban on single-use plastic bags.

Heal the Bay scientist Sarah Sikich, Senator Alex Padilla, Heal the Bay CEO Ruskin Hartley, and Senator Kevin de Leon Yes, people will criticize it from both sides – as either going too far, or not far enough. But this afternoon at the press conference at a manufacturing plant in Vernon it was heartening to see voices from labor, manufacturers, community groups and the environment come together. Everyone can rally around a solution that shows that California continues to lead on issues that are good for the environment and business.  

We started this campaign with our colleagues in the environmental community seven years ago. This issue would not even be on the radar screen of the Legislature were it not for the voices of our supporters and other concerned groups around the state.

Today, bag bans cover 90 municipalities in California, creating a regulatory hodgepodge and a patchwork of environmental protections. When the state acts comprehensively, we’ll have taken a big step forward that can serve as inspiration for the rest of the nation. We will help tackle the scourge of marine pollution and urban blight, and show that being green can also support our economy. Thank you!