Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Author: Matt King

For the last four years I have been a member of the City of Los Angeles’s Recycled Water Advisory Group (affectionately known as “RWAG”).  Led by the L.A. Department of Water and Power and L.A. Bureau of Sanitation, this diverse group of stakeholders from the government, business and nonprofit sectors keep tabs on the city’s efforts to increase water recycling.

Basically, we all want to avoid the downhill spiral that resulted from the toilet-to-tap debate in 2000, in which mayoral candidate Joel Wachs suggested that a DWP plan to recycle treated wastewater near Hansen Dam would result in Valley residents drinking “toilet water” in the future. The media coverage and public uproar eventually lead to the shuttering of the city’s recycling efforts for years.

RWAG didn’t get off to a great start.  In fact, many groups were disillusioned early in the process when LADWP’s initial goal of producing at least an additional 50,000 acre-feet per year of recycled water by 2019 was suddenly pushed back to 2029. Now the goal that I hear most often is 59,000 acre-feet per year by 2035. Let’s stick to a goal and make it happen!  (For some perspective, the city of L.A. uses about 621,000 acre feet of water each year, with an acre foot being about 326,000 gallons.  So the new goal would result in recycling accounting for a little less than 10% of our water supply.)

However, reflecting on the last four years, there are significant signs of progress on the recycled water front.   

In October 2012, LADWP adopted its Recycled Water Master Plan.  This plan outlines plans for groundwater replenishment and non-potable reuse strategies within the city. Basically, these plans calls for highly treated wastewater from sewage plants to be pumped to other facilities that can supply it for irrigation and other uses other than drinking water. Other projects would replenish groundwater by pumping this treated wastewater — which meets all water quality standardss — back into the aquifer for further natural cleansing and use.

The advanced treatment pilot project that explored treatment technology effectiveness was completed at the Tillman wastewater treatment plant, and the draft EIR for the project is expected this fall.  This is a big deal. However, the project is contingent on the construction of the San Fernando Basin Groundwater Treatment Complex and that costs big money ($600 million-$900 million, according to estimates given the L.A. City Council’s Energy and Environment Committee last week).

There are also non-potable reuse projects popping up around the city.    For instance, the Harbor Refineries Pipeline Project will have 40,400 feet of recycled water piping that will convey recycled water to large industrial and irrigation customers by June 2014.

And this week the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board approved a permit amendment to allow the Water Replenishment District’s Alamitos Barrier project to move toward 100% recycled water. The Barrier project, located on the L.A.-Orange County border, uses 43 injections wells to prevent seawater intrusion into groundwater supplies and to replenish Los Angeles County’s Central Basin. The recycling program would save 3 million gallons per day of potable water, the equivalent of serving the needs of 7,000 homes. 

LADWP’s Master Plan also concluded what many of us already knew — the city’s recycled water program is less expensive than the cost of purchased imported water from MWD over the long-term.  As an example, the upcoming non-potable projects in Downtown and East Valley are estimated to have a unit cost of $220 and $560 per acre foot, respectively, whereas imported water is running at $890 per acre foot. 

I believe we are ready for widespread recycled water use.  Just look at our neighbors in Orange County who are replenishing their groundwater basin with 70 million gallons of treated effluent daily.  An outreach study recently commissioned by LADWP found that the majority of residential and commercial customers support the concept behind the proposed groundwater replenishment. And 87% find that action needs to be taken to ensure L.A.’s water supply.  Keep in mind that this was data collected before the Governor’s recent drought declaration, so these numbers likely will climb.

At our RWAG meeting last week we discussed finalizing the “RWAG Consensus Statement,” which outlines the group’s strong support of recycled water to augment the groundwater supply and keeps the door open to exploring direct potable reuse.   Even that small move is a measure of how far we have come from the days of toilet-to-tap (which, by the way, is now called “showers to flowers”).  With more widespread public acceptance and the increasing pressures on our water supply, it is all the more important that we ramp up these efforts and start exceeding the goals.   



Heal the Bay president Ruskin Hartley spends a night at the cinema.

I don’t normally go in for depressing documentaries. But when the local art house is showing a documentary on water around the world (“Last Call at the Oasis“), followed by a panel discussion with some of my friends and board members at Heal the Bay, I will make an exception.

The recent screening at Santa Monica’s Aero Theatre presented moving stories from Las Vegas, Texas, Australia, Israel and right here in California that painted a pretty grim picture of our water woes around the world. Pesticides are bleeding endocrine disruptors into water, turning male frogs into females. Kids are getting lesions from swimming in water polluted with fracking chemicals. The aquifer below the great Central Valley is being bled dry from unregulated wells. Mix in the disruption of climate change and you have a depressing narrative. As one of the scientists summed up: “We’re screwed.”

But amid the doom and gloom there are glimmers of hope. Some of these glimpses appeared in the film, others were shared by the panelists. For years I have been hearing about water wars. Turns out the concept is a fallacy. A social scientist had studied wars over the past 50 years and found that water had actually brought warring sides together even as conflict raged.

And think we’ll never be drinking recycled water? Think again. Singapore already meets 30% of its potable needs through cleverly branded “new” water. Turns out recycled water is more regulated and safer than bottled water. The answer? Put “new” water in bottles and sell it as “porcelain springs” with a slick campaign!

Better water policy often boils down to local communities coming together to stand up for their local water sources and solve problems in their neighborhoods, communities, cities and states. Take Santa Monica, as an example. Tired of waiting for the state or federal government to clean up groundwater contaminated with MTBE and other noxious chemicals, it took matters into its own hands and sued the oil companies responsible for the pollution. The result? $250 million to clean up local groundwater. Local water supplies in Santa Monica have shot from zero percent to 72 percent in a few short years.

We need to take that approach at every level. And we can’t wait for it to happen to us. We just need to get it done.

Our cities and state can start to invest in local water today. We should be cleaning up groundwater. We should be capturing stormwater to recharge our aquifers and irrigate our lawns and golf courses. (Of course, it’d be better if we started moving away from having to maintain water-intensive lawns and gardens, but that’s the subject for another post). And we should be recycling more waste water — as David Nahai said, “It’s only waste water if we choose to waste it.” (David sat on the panel with fellow boardmember Mark Gold, the former longtime president of Heal the Bay.)

And on a personal level, we can work to reduce our water footprint in a number of ways: installing low-flow fixtures, capturing rain in rain barrels, installing simple and cheap grey water systems to re-use water from washing machines to water the garden.

 I turned my sprinklers off before the rain started to fall. Did you?



The 3-Day Rule has long been a mantra at Heal the Bay – always wait three days after a rainstorm before getting back into the ocean.

But a recent study conducted by UCLA environmental science students in conjunction with Heal the Bay’s water quality team indicates that extra caution may be warranted at certain locations, especially stormdrain-impacted beaches and enclosed beaches.

The new report, which analyzed Heal the Bay’s beach water quality data for the past seven years,  reveals that many popular beaches near stormdrains in Southern California remain riddled with bacterial pollution up to five days after rain and pose a health risk. There are more than 100 stormdrain-impacted beaches in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.

Malibu Surfrider, Santa Monica Pier, and Doheny are among the iconic Southland beaches located near flowing storm drain outfalls. These outfalls carry bacteria-laden urban runoff directly from city streets into the sea. So it seems wise to avoid these beaches for at least 5 days after a storm.

The main source of pollution to Santa Monica and San Pedro bays is urban runoff carried through the county’s 5,000 mile-long storm drain system. Unlike sewage, this runoff typically receives no treatment and flows freely onto shorelines and the sea through the network of open channels, catch basins and streams.

Exposure to bacteria from runoff can cause a variety of illnesses, most frequently respiratory infection and stomach flu. Human pathogens of unknown origins can also be carried down gutters.

Separately, enclosed beaches located near harbors and marinas often did not meet beach water quality standards for 10 days after a rain, according to findings from UCLA undergraduates participating in a program with the school’s Institute of the Environment and Sustainability.

Enclosed beaches, such as Marina del Rey’s Mother’s Beach or L.A.’s Cabrillo Harbor, do not have the strong currents and breakers of open-ocean beaches. The lack of waves may be reassuring to some parents but it leads to very poor ocean circulation.

Students analyzed water quality data gathered weekly by Heal the Bay with the goal to re-evaluate the California Department of Public Health advisories. More than 87,000 data points from the 32 most frequently monitored beaches in California were analyzed for levels of harmful bacterial pollution.

“The UCLA study indicates that the 3-Day Rule may not be adequate to protect the health of all ocean swimmers,” said Amanda Griesbach, a Heal the Bay staff scientist. “Until the rule is modified, swimmers are better protected by avoiding storm drain impacted and enclosed beaches for 5-10 days after a storm.”

Heal the Bay urges beachgoers to check the latest water quality grades for more than 400 beaches statewide, based on the latest samples, each week at beachreportcard.org.

 The full UCLA-Heal the Bay report can be found here.



Kirsten James, our science and policy co-director, shares a special night on the red carpet with our board member..

Wow, what a party! Last night I had the opportunity to attend the unite4:humanity event on the Sony Pictures lot honoring Heal the Bay’s very own board member, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, for her service to Heal the Bay and environmental causes. The dinner and awards program, presented by unite4:good and Variety, also recognized the philanthropic work of Bill Clinton, director Martin Scorsese, singer Alicia Keys and youth star Selena Gomez.

I jumped at the chance to be there to support Julia, as I have been blown away by her dedication to our cause during my nine years with Heal the Bay. Walking to Los Angeles City Hall with Julia last year right before the successful vote on the single-use plastic bag ban remains one of the highlights of my career. Julia met with the councilmembers to make sure they understood the importance of the issue. She also provided poignant testimony before the Council, with a twist of humor of course.

Julia Louis-Dreyfus honored at unite4:good event for her work with Heal the BayFor someone steeped in the world of nonprofits, the entertainment industry remains a bit of a mystery. Hollywood is something you read and hear about constantly, but it’s not something most people get to experience first-hand. So I was pretty star-struck to sit at a table with Julia, Jane Fonda, Bobby Kennedy and Cheryl Hines. Who would have thought that I’d ever be having a conversation with Jane Fonda during Oscar week about blue whales in Santa Monica Bay?!

No matter how big a celebrity, everyone we met at the 1,000-person event seemed genuinely interested in hearing more about what we do at Heal the Bay. It’s great to be working on a cause that everyone can so easily grasp and relate to – clean oceans and beaches. Meeting President Clinton was the icing on the cake. (I already emailed the photos to my mom!)

But the true highlight of the night was hearing Julia’s speech about Heal the Bay and why our work is important to her. Her passion came through in every word. It made me so proud to work for this organization.

A big THANK YOU to Julia, Variety and unite4:good for celebrating the work that we and many others do to create positive change throughout the world. Hopefully, the room full of creative storytellers and media executives was moved by our efforts and can share the stories with their audiences.

Watch: Julia Louis-Dreyfus awarded for her work with Heal the Bay from Heal the Bay.



With heavy storms forecast for the weekend we take a look at what all that rain means for our local beaches and ocean:

What does the recent storm mean for our local environment?

In a time of severe drought, storms will help recharge our local aquifers and increase water supply. That’s a good thing. But all the rainfall also has a downside, namely polluted runoff hitting our local beaches and ocean.

Where does all the storm-related runoff go?

After a big rainstorm, L.A. County’s 5,000-mile stormdrain system and local waterbodies carry runoff straight to the ocean. Engineers in the 1930s and ‘40s designed the stormdrain system to prevent area flooding. L.A. is like a giant concrete bowl titled to the sea, with thousands of miles of freeways, parking lots and other impervious surfaces draining to the beach.

With such a severe drought, couldn’t we make better use of all that water dumped in the ocean?

Yes. Sending urban runoff to the sea is a huge waste of a precious resource. Los Angeles imports costly and increasingly scarce water from Northern California and the Colorado River. Storm water — if captured in groundwater basins, cisterns and other devices — could provide a safe, more secure and less costly source of drinking water. Heal the Bay is now working on a public funding measure to support regional multi-benefit stormwater capture and reuse projects.

What are the impacts of stormwater on our local beaches and ocean?

Urban runoff is the No. 1 source of pollution on our beaches. As rainfall runs through the streets and stormdrains, it picks up harmful contaminants along the way – trash, pet waste, chemicals, fertilizers and metals. All that gross stuff winds up in the ocean and along the shoreline.

In what way do local residents contribute to the runoff problem?

Among many items, Angelenos add to debris buildup by dropping nearly 1 million cigarette butts on the ground each month, according to L.A. County Department of Public Works estimates in 2010. Citizens walk a dog without picking up the droppings more than 82,000 times per month, and they hose off driveways and sidewalks into storm drains more than 415,000 times each month.

Why isn’t the runoff treated?

Some cities have combined stormwater and sewer systems, but Los Angeles has completely separate water drainage systems. The sheer volume of runoff generated in the nation’s second-largest city makes it difficult to treat.

How much runoff are we actually talking about?

After a single powerful storm, up to 10 billion gallons of contaminated water and trash flow daily through our storm drains, creeks and rivers into the Santa Monica and San Pedro Bays. That’s the equivalent of 100 Rose Bowls filled with polluted water.

What does all this runoff to do the ocean and the animals that call it home?

Countless animals each year die from ingesting trash or getting entangled in manmade debris. Seawater laden with chemicals and metals makes it harder for local marine life to thrive and reproduce.

What about the human health impacts?

Beachgoers who come in contact with polluted water face a much higher risk of contracting illnesses such as stomach flu, ear infections, upper respiratory infections and skin rashes. A UCLA epidemiology study found that swimmers are twice as likely to get sick from swimming in front of a flowing storm drain than from recreating in open water.

How can ocean lovers stay safe after rainfall?

  • Wait at least 72 hours before entering the water for most beaches and avoid storm drain impacted and enclosed beaches for 5 to 10 days
  • Stay away from storm drains, piers and enclosed beaches with poor circulation
  • Go to Heal the Bay’s beachreportcard.org to get latest water quality grades and updates

What about the economic impacts?

People make nearly 50 million visits to Santa Monica Bay beaches each year. And the coastal economy in Los Angeles County generates more than $20 billion in goods and services each year. Polluted water and debris-laden beaches put these economic drivers at risk.

What can people do to reduce the impact of runoff-related pollution?

  • Dispose of litter properly. Keeping trash out of the street, keeps trash out of the sea. Cigarette butts and Styrofoam pieces are the two most frequently found items at our beach cleanups.
  • Rip up your lawn. Nearly half of our water is used to care for our lawns. Not only is it a waste of water in an arid climate, it contributes to poor water quality due to pesticides and fertilizers.
  • Keep rainwater on site. Many cities offer rebates to homeowners who install rain barrels or cisterns, which capture and infiltrate rainfall for later use around the home.

What can I do to reduce the immediate impact of all the storm debris washing onto our beaches?

Consdier joining Heal the Bay’s new Storm Response Team, a rugged squad of volunteers and staff ready to give some TLC to our most trash-impacted beaches. After big storms, the crew leaps into and removes debris and catalogues it for our ongoing stormwater advocacy efforts.

Want to get a graphic, real-time look at storm debris impacting our shoreline? Check out this nighttime video of runoff hitting the beach at Bay Street in Santa Monica



Staff scientist Amanda Griesbach says new guidelines will make it easier to fix troubled beaches.

As a water quality scientist, I get a lot of questions about local beach water quality, sources of pollution, and public health risks. Sometimes, providing a definitive answer can be tough. There are a lot of variables when it comes to figuring out what’s going on at a particular site — location, time of year, and the type of beach (enclosed, open ocean or stormdrain impacted). When you factor in random bacteria distribution in a given location, the science behind beach water quality may not seem so black and white.

Under state law, weekly monitoring is required between April 1 and October 31 for all coastal beaches adjacent to a flowing stormdrain (or known point source) that receive 50,000 or more annual visitors.  The weekly results from a single 100 mL sample of beach water (about the size of a small cup of coffee) are used to make and inform important public health decisions. But challenges loom when analyzing that sample for harmful bacteria and taking corrective action.

For example, current testing methods fail to differentiate among various fecal sources, such as bird, dog or human. Obviously, the first priority is just establishing that there are bacteria in the water. But if we want to abate harmful micro-organisms, we need to know specifically where they are coming from.

And we’re also trying to get more rapid forms of testing. Right now, it takes about 18-24 hours to process a sample. Rapid methods now being developed would give us a snapshot of a particular beach as soon as 4-6 hours, which would be more protective of public health. But it could be years before these new methods are incorporated into state and/or federal beach monitoring standards.

Heal the Bay has always been proactive when it comes to improving beach water quality, and thankfully the State Water Board has supported improving California’s coastal beach water quality through its Clean Beaches Initiative Grant Program.

The Board launched the CBI Grant Program in 2001 in response to the poor water quality and significant exceedances of fecal indicator bacteria along coastal beaches. A Clean Beach Task Force was convened with experts from local agencies, environmental groups, academia, government, and scientific organizations to assist the Board in reviewing beach water improvement project proposals, evaluating their success, and identifying critical beach water quality research needs.

As a member of the task force, I have often found it challenging to decide which water quality improvement efforts are most appropriate and/or effective at a certain beach. The decision becomes even more trying when source identification efforts, protocols, and priorities are inconsistent from beach to beach, from county agency to county agency.

Luckily, the project selection process may be easier in the future, as the State Board recently released a new manual that spells out a clear protocol for tracking bacterial pollution at troubled beaches across the state.

The new set of guidelines – called The California Microbial Source Identification Manual:  A Tiered Approach to Identifying Fecal Pollution Sources to Beaches – is based on the collaborative research efforts of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP), Stanford University, UCLA, UCSB and Virginia Tech.

The manual will assist beach managers in identifying sources of fecal bacteria through a step-by-step protocol. The process starts with identifying more obvious potential sources (e.g. large bird population due to uncovered trash bins), as it guides the user through more complex source tracking techniques, including the investigation of a potential sewer/septic leak using genetic markers.

The new source identification manual will not only provide consistency for all future source identification studies, but will allow task force members to make more informed decisions about funding  water quality improvement projects. While the manual may be geared towards beach managers and researchers, it contains background information on potential fecal bacteria sources, mitigation efforts and the CBI Program that the general beachgoing public can benefit from.

I commend the State Board and researchers who worked diligently to complete this manual. We’re now one step closer to having a uniform Beach Program, where the benefits of consistent and efficient monitoring will ultimately lead to strengthened coastal public health protection.

The full manual can be found at:  http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/beaches/cbi_projects/docs/sipp_manual.pdf

 



Heal the Bay president Ruskin Hartley on what it really means to waste water:

On Wednesday I joined Mayor Garcetti, Gov. Brown and members of the President’s Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience at a reception at the Getty House to kick off day-long talks about how the federal government can help communities confront climate change. And today in Fresno, President Obama is unveiling an aid package for communities hit hardest by the drought.

Even as we address immediate needs of drought-stricken communities, we must move beyond short-term aid and invest in a water system for California’s future. And that presents historic opportunities for our work at Heal the Bay. Since 1985, we have been focused on cleaning up pollution in California’s waterways and ocean.  We have had some remarkable successes.  However, many of the state’s rivers and streams still fail to meet clean water standards and much of our groundwater is polluted.

There’s much discussion at the moment about how we “waste” water by dumping it into the ocean. Every time I hear that I cringe. While it is not a waste to let water flow to the ocean (it’s an essential part of the natural system that keeps us alive), it is a waste to dump highly treated water in the ocean that could be reused to off-set dwindling imported supplies.   And we do this every day from countless wastewater treatment plants. One plant alone, Hyperion out by LAX,  flushes 250 million gallons a day of treated wastewater into Santa Monica Bay – equivalent to the water needs of 2 ½ million people. That’s unconscionable waste!

And then there’s stormwater. When it rains, millions of gallons of rain flush through the urban watershed via engineered culverts and channels, picking up pollutants in a rush to the ocean. In a naturally functioning system, much of this would infiltrate into the ground and replenish our aquifers.  Instead we are left with polluted beaches and depleted aquifers. Crazy! 

We cannot make it rain. But we can make much better use of the precious water we have. Today, Heal the Bay is advocating for solutions and investments that make better use of our local water resources: groundwater clean-up, stormwater capture and recharge, and increased recycling. Taken as a package, they will go a long way to cleaning up our rivers, streams, and ocean. And that will make for a healthier bay. I’ll drink to that!



Kirsten James, Heal the Bay’s director of water quality, recently took a trip to China to discuss environmental issues with policymakers in the world’s most populous nation. Here she shares her reflections.

I’m back from China, and breathing a lot easier. I had a fabulous time, but the air pollution is brutal! Last month, the Beijing government invited me to speak to its Water Authority about water issues and regulation in California and share lessons to help inform the development of Beijing’s Water Action Plan.  My trip was a great learning experience, providing an up-close view of Chinese culture and how the nation goes about tackling environmental issues.

Addressing water supply and water quality is no small task for Beijing managers, given that they serve a population of more than 21 million residents. Officials I spoke with repeatedly pointed to population growth as their greatest environmental challenge.  As I described our work to benefit the city of Los Angeles and its 4 million residents, they nodded but said we are on a totally different playing field.  Nonetheless, they seemed keen to investigate how practices used to manage water in California could be introduced to Beijing, such as Total Maximum Daily Loads, other pollution limits and low impact development requirements.

In some respects, Beijing could be considered a step ahead of us in conservation. The city has had success implementing the use of grey water, water metering and price-tiering. Yet those programs might be attributed to an overly strong government hand and more lax public health regulations, which may not be a good thing.

My Chinese colleagues got a good chuckle when I mentioned that people in the greater L.A. region use 187 gallons of water per day on average.  One participant noted that he keeps a bucket of grey water from his sink/laundry to flush his toilet.  Beijing  has significant water recycling initiatives and is seriously exploring indirect potable reuse, so-called “toilet to tap” technologies. Beijing has definitely taken notice of Orange County’s cutting-edge efforts to cleanse wastewater and turn it into drinking water.

My biggest takeaway was seeing how the Chinese government has such a strong role in both hindering and encouraging environmental progress.  For example, if the government owns much of the industry and business, are officials going to make themselves the “responsible party” for cleaning up a groundwater contamination issue or an industrial spill?  However, if the government determines that a new subway line needs to go in within the year and that people shouldn’t drive a certain day of the week to help reduce air pollution, this can be done overnight (no CEQA in China)!

Local municipalities, residents, businesses and public policy advocates in Southern California struggle with the number of agencies dealing with water management. It can be hard to gain consensus and move forward when there are so many silos (e.g., the DWP, MWD and L.A. County Public Works).  Beijing had a similar problem, with 70 different agencies working on water issues.  So in 2004, the government decided the competing unit would all unify into one agency. Voila!

I learned a lot in Beijing to broaden my perspective on water management and hopefully I provided some tools that can help officials there develop and implement a robust water plan.  However, it’s good to be home, drinking clean water from the tap and enjoying a clear blue sky.    



Heal the Bay CEO Ruskin Hartley gets a slice of life — and pie — spending a day in Malibu with some inspiring kids.

If you have spent any time on a surfboard you are probably familiar with Duke Paoa Kahanamoku, Hawaii’s legendary Olympic swimmer and surf evangelist. In 1912, he won the 100 meters freestyle in the Stockholm Olympics. And starting in the 1920s, he starred in a dozen feature films. But between Olympic competition and filming, he travelled the world inspiring a love of the ocean through his passion for swimming and his introduction of surfing to an unsuspecting world.Heal the Bay's Melissa Aguayo teaching at Duke's Malibu during Lunch n' Learn

In its own way, Heal the Bay is continuing Kahanamoku’s legacy with an innovative partnership we call “Lunch and Learn.” For the past three years we have partnered with a restaurant that bears his name, Duke’s in Malibu, to introduce kids to the ocean and teach them simple things they can do to care for it every day.

The program combines an outdoor field-trip for elementary schoolchildren with a hosted sit-down lunch overlooking the Pacific Ocean. Many of these kids, all of whom come from Title I schools, have never been to the ocean despite it being in their backyard. The icing on the cake is the lunch served to them on white linen as they sit and watch for whales and dolphins (actually, the icing is fudge sauce and macadamia nuts….). I recall having that only once on a field-trip growing up, but that’s another story.

Students raise their hands during Heal the Bay's Lunch n' Learn education program at Duke's MalibuI was fortunate to help out with this morning’s field-trip. From the moment the fourth grade classes arrived on the big red bus from the Crescent Heights Language Arts/Social Justice Magnet school in Los Angeles, to the last slice of famous Hula Pie, there were smiles all around. But this wasn’t just about buses and pie, important as both are. The heart of the program teaches kids about the relationship between what they do in their everyday life and the impact it has on the ocean. The link being the stormdrain that washes the debris from their playground, street and home through to the deep blue of the Pacific Ocean.

It was inspiring to watch the kids work in groups to test hypotheses about how water will interact with various surfaces, or sieve sand in search of elusive sandcrabs. After lunch, everyone became animated during the quiz as they shouted out answers like “entanglement,” “impermeable,” and “stop littering” as they competed for prizes.

They understand that they can do simple things to help out. I found it very touching to watch them share dessert and talk about their desire to become scientists and engineers when they grew up. All that through a day at the beach, and a slice of tasty hula pie. Thank you Duke’s and the Ella Fitzgerald Foundation!

Heal the Bay provides beach education through our Lunch ‘n Learn program to 500 Title 1 students per year. Learn more about our science-based educational efforts. Lunch’ n Learn is just the beginning.

Group photo during Heal the Bay's Lunch n' Learn education program at Duke's Malibu



Heal the Bay CEO Ruskin Hartley shares his thoughts on a very good day for the prospect of a statewide ban on plastic bags.

I came back to my desk on Wednesday to a pink Post-It note letting me know that state Sen. Kevin de León’s office had called. The note was simple: Please call back. It was “quite pressing.”  His staff wanted to invite Heal the Bay to speak at a press conference on Friday announcing that state legislative leaders had finally come together and forged a compromise on a new bill that would ban single-use plastic bags across the state.

L.A.-based state Sens. Alex Padilla and de Leon have found a workaround on an issue that helped short-circuit previous legislation: the notion that bans would kill local jobs. The legislative approach revealed Friday includes incentives for manufacturers to retool and build their reusable bag-product lines, thereby investing in green jobs right here in California. 

After seven long years and several Heal the Bay campaigns, it appears that the end is in sight for single-use plastic grocery bags across the state. While SB 270 still needs to make its way through both houses and off the Governor’s desk, we are optimistic — now that  two of the Senate’s heaviest hitters are behind it. (Assemblymember Ricardo Lara also joined the conference, helping solidify the bloc of local Democrats who historically have had concerns with elements of past bag-ban proposals.)

If SB 270 moves forward, California will become the first state in the nation to pass a comprehensive ban on single-use plastic bags.

Heal the Bay scientist Sarah Sikich, Senator Alex Padilla, Heal the Bay CEO Ruskin Hartley, and Senator Kevin de Leon Yes, people will criticize it from both sides – as either going too far, or not far enough. But this afternoon at the press conference at a manufacturing plant in Vernon it was heartening to see voices from labor, manufacturers, community groups and the environment come together. Everyone can rally around a solution that shows that California continues to lead on issues that are good for the environment and business.  

We started this campaign with our colleagues in the environmental community seven years ago. This issue would not even be on the radar screen of the Legislature were it not for the voices of our supporters and other concerned groups around the state.

Today, bag bans cover 90 municipalities in California, creating a regulatory hodgepodge and a patchwork of environmental protections. When the state acts comprehensively, we’ll have taken a big step forward that can serve as inspiration for the rest of the nation. We will help tackle the scourge of marine pollution and urban blight, and show that being green can also support our economy. Thank you!