Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Category: News

It’s time for Los Angeles to move beyond coal power. LADWP (Los Angeles Department of Water and Power) is considering a plan to sell its stake by 2014 in the Navajo Generating Station, which is, according to the Sierra Club, one of the largest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants in the entire country. The LADWP is asking for customer feedback on this plan.

Please take two minutes and complete the LADWP survey. Make sure to mark moving beyond coal as a high priority.

Photo: Navajo Generating Station via Wikipedia



On Thursday, the California Supreme Court issued a decision reversing a previous Court of Appeal decision that ruled the City of Manhattan Beach should have conducted a full Environmental Impact Report to inform their plastic bag ban ordinance adopted back in July 2008.

A group of plastic bag manufacturers known as Save the Plastic Bag had opposed the City of Manhattan Beach plastic bag ban, arguing that switching to paper bags would actually increase the volume in landfills and have other adverse environmental impacts. The California Supreme Court reversed a previous decision by the Court of Appeal (who sided with Save the Plastic Bag) concluding “substantial evidence and common sense support the city’s determination that its ordinance would have no significant environmental effect.”

This ruling now paves the way for cities considering similar policies to move forward. The decision sends a strong message that these frivolous lawsuits brought by polluting interests against environmental laws under the guise of the California Environmental Quality Act are a waste of time and money.

To read more about the case, see Mark Gold’s blog post, “Sweet Justice.”

Photo Natalie Burdick



Attention shoppers! Effective Friday, July 1, 2011, large supermarkets and pharmacies in Los Angeles County’s unincorporated areas are not allowed to distribute single use plastic
bags.

More Information

Share

Questions?

  • Call 310.451.1500, x116

Approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on November 16, 2010, the ban prohibits the distribution of single-use plastic shopping bags
at grocery stores, convenience stores and pharmacies in unincorporated
areas, which encompass some 1 million residents and 65% of the county.

The ban is intended to promote the use of reusable bags over single use plastic and paper carryout bags in order to reduce the negative economic and environmental impacts associated with single use bags.

The county is now the largest municipality in the nation to ban plastic
bags and has spurred a substantial amount of interest in this issue with many jurisdictions are contemplating similar actions. Some cities within Los Angeles County who have already passed similar ordinances are: Malibu, Long Beach, Santa Monica, and Calabasas.

Heal the Bay has led the legislative fight to enact a bag ban for
more than five years as part of its ongoing efforts to tackle plastic
pollution in California seas and neighborhoods.

Learn more! (on this page)


FAQ’s about the L.A. County Bag Ban

Why ban bags now?

  • Californians use more than 19 billion plastic grocery and merchandise bags each year, roughly 552 bags per person. This usage generates 147,038 tons of unnecessary waste — enough to stretch around the globe over 250 times.
  • Californians throw away over 600 plastic bags per second.
  • California taxpayers spend millions to collect and landfill plastic bag waste each year. That figure does not include external costs, e.g. resource extraction and depletion, quality of life issues, economic loss due to plastic bag litter.
  • U.S. consumers use 100 billion plastic bags annually, which are all made from fossil fuels.

Where does the ban apply?

The ban would include neighborhoods in Los Angeles County unincorporated areas. The areas that are not part of the 88 cities considered to be unincorporated L.A. County. More than 65% of Los Angeles County is unincorporated. For the 1 million people living in these areas, the Board of Supervisors and County Departments provide the municipal services.

Are all plastic carry out bags banned?

Yes. Plastic carryout bags are any bag made predominantly of plastic (either petroleum or a biologically-based source, such as corn or other plants) provided to a customer at the cash register.

Will I get a paper bag instead?

During manufacturing, both paper and plastic bags emit global warming gases, create water pollution and use raw materials and energy. Paper is not the answer. If you didn’t bring a reusable bag and you must have a bag, you will have to buy a paper bag for 10 cents.

  • The paper bags must be 100% recyclable and contain a minimum of 40% postconsumer recycled material and display the word “Recyclable” in a highly visible manner on the outside of the bag.

What do I put my green beans and meat in?

The ban does not include produce bags or product bags. That means any bag without handles used exclusively to carry produce, meats, bread or other food items to the cash register, will not be included in the ban.

What happens to the 10 cents collected by the store?

Monies collected by a store for paper bags will be retained by the store and may be used only for:

  • Costs associated with complying with the requirements of the ban
  • Actual costs of providing recyclable paper carryout bags
  • Costs associated with a store’s educational materials or education campaign encouraging the use of reusable bags

What if I can’t afford reusable bags?

All stores must provide bags free of charge to any customer participating either in the California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children or in the Supplemental Food Program

What stores are covered by the ban?

Hopefully you will make the choice to use reusable bags everywhere, but plastic carry out bags will no longer be available at any of the following retail establishments located within the unincorporated area of the County:

  • Supermarkets
  • Large retail pharmacies
  • Liquor stores and food marts

Why Replace Plastic Grocery Bags With Reusable Bags?

  • Each year, approximately 6 billion plastic bags are consumed in Los Angeles County. This is equivalent to 600 bags per person per year.
  • Approximately 150,000 tons of plastic bags are disposed by Los Angeles County residents each year.
  • Disposable bags cost our cities up to 17 cents per bag for disposal.
    Plastic bags are made from fossil fuels. Americans use over 380 billion bags every year, wasting this precious resource.
  • Alternatives such as reusable bags are readily available and affordable.
  • Some areas of the Pacific Ocean contain six times more plastic debris than zooplankton (the fundamental base of our food chain.) These tiny pieces of plastic are eaten by zooplankton and move up the food chain, potentially presenting health risks for humans.

Benefits of Implementing Widespread Use of Reusable Bags

  • Significant cost savings to taxpayers – less money spent on litter cleanup, enforcement, prevention
  • Fewer plastic bags littering our community
  • Fewer impacts to the marine environment (marine wildlife, such as sea turtles and whales ingest littered plastic bags, that they mistake for food)
  • Fewer natural resources consumed


As most everyone knows by now, the California Coastal Commission bravely voted 8-4 Thursday against the Edge’s proposal for a compound of mansions overlooking the Pacific in Malibu.  The highly controversial project from the U2 guitarist would have caused substantial damage to environmentally sensitive habitat area and did not include plans to reduce polluted runoff or treat and dispose of sewage generated onsite.  Clearly, the developers’ offer of $1 million to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for trail access and land conservation was not enough to sway the commissionvote.

The Los Angeles Times quoted Peter Douglas, the commission’s iconic director, as saying:  “In 38 years of this commission’s existence, this is one of the three worst projects that I’ve seen in terms of environmental devastation. It’s a contradiction in terms — you can’t be serious about being an environmentalist and pick this location” given the effects on habitat, land formation, scenic views and water quality. 

Although we raised concerns about the Edge’s proposed development, I disagree with Douglas’ statement on its scale relative to the projects considered by the commission through history. In fact, I consider it to be the second most environmentally damaging project voted on by the commission Thursday — Malibu Valley Farms is far worse.

Read more & comment» (new window)



There’s a special project making a mini tour of Southern California next week. The Clean Oceans Project is showing off new technology that converts waste plastic into oil without toxic emissions or byproducts.

The project is making a stop on Tuesday, the 21st, at noon at Venice’s Electric Lodge, a solar-powered visual and performing arts center, where you’ll have a chance to catch the demonstration. Engineers at Blest Co. LTD of Japan developed a processing system that vaporizes and then distills the plastic back into petroleum-based liquid fuels.

Want to check out the process in action? To reserve your space at the demonstration, contact Captain Jim Holm at capthomer@thecleanoceansproject.org or call 831-251-4656.

Photo: woodlywonderworks via Flickr



Hundreds of competitors and thousands of spectators gathered Sunday to honor paddleboarding’s past and present at the Santa Monica Pier Paddle Race and Ocean Festival.

The event, sponsored by Honolua Surf Co., was part of the World Paddle Association’s championship qualifying series and featured some of the top paddlers in the country. The elite class paddlers raced on a 5.5 mile course which was won overall by Dialy Ndiaye with a time of 54:12. Lifeguard and prone paddler Anthony Vela was second overall with 54:31. Candace Appleby was the fastest woman, winning the women’s elite prone paddle with a time of one hour four minutes and twenty seconds. Complete results will be posted at www.pierpaddle.com.

“Our company is all about supporting the traditions of these sports and of the waterman lifestyle,” said Pat Fraley, brand manger of Honolua, “This event was an example of all that and more.”

Paddlers in this year’s race ranged in age from 9-years old to people well into their seventies. Also present were a number of families with multiple generations who raced together. The Pier Paddle also showcased lifeguard dory races and an outrigger canoe competition.

“They were fantastic water races and a wonderful celebration of Santa Monica’s formative place in the evolution of paddleboarding, surfing and ocean lifesaving,” said Joel Brand, event director. “And it’s only going to keep getting better next year.”

While paddleboarding is exploding in popularity today, it has a long prior history, including a heyday in the 1940’s when the Santa Monica Pier was a hub for racing. The sport disappeared for decades, eclipsed by surfing, only to be brought back to life with the innovation of stand up paddling, or SUP.
The Pier Paddle was a benefit for Santa Monica-based Heal the Bay and its public marine education facility, the Santa Monica Pier Aquarium. Heal the Bay will receive a portion of net proceeds from the event.

“Bringing paddle sports back to the Santa Monica Bay and the Pier is a wonderful measure of Heal the Bay’s 25-plus years of work to improve water quality,” said Randi Parent, public outreach specialist at Heal the Bay’s Santa Monica Pier Aquarium. “It’s gratifying that the paddle sports community has come together to support a cleaner, healthier bay for the benefit of us all, and particularly for the marine life.”

Event partners and sponsors include: Honolua Surf Co., Quickblade Paddles, Subaru of Santa Monica, Heal the Bay, ZJ Boarding House, Pacific Park on the Santa Monica Pier, Santa Monica Daily Press, Rusty’s Surf Ranch, Mariasol Restaurant, Hawaiian Gun Rack, Positive Existence, H2O Audio, Clif Bar, SUP Connect, Coreban, Surftech, Santa Monica Convention and Visitors Bureau, Wilczy Studio, World Paddle Association, National Doryman’s Association, Marina del Rey Outrigger Canoe Club and Lanakila Outrigger Canoe Club.

Photo: Stefano Paltera



Heal the Bay’s 21st Annual Beach Report Card® provides water quality information to the millions of people who swim, surf or dive in California, Oregon and Washington coastal waters. This is the first annual report to cover the entire West Coast, with the debut of beach water quality grades from our northern neighbors, Oregon and Washington.

Button - View Full Report

Report Snapshots  

Just the Grades

Press Releases by Region

Documents in Spanish

Contacts at Heal the Bay

The 2011 Annual Beach Report Card incorporates more than 150 additional monitoring locations along the coasts of Washington and Oregon. Essential reading for ocean users, the report card grades approximately 600 locations along the West Coast for summer dry weather and more than 324 locations year-round on an A-to-F scale based on the risk of adverse health effects to beachgoers. The grades are based on fecal bacteria pollution concentrations in the surf zone. The program has evolved from an annual review of beaches in the Santa Monica Bay to weekly updates of beach monitoring locations throughout California, Oregon and Washington. All of this information is available on this website, www.healthebay.org, and the online Beach Report Card microsite at www.beachreportcard.org.

Recreating in waters with increased bacteria concentrations has been associated with increased risks to human health, such as stomach flu, nausea, skin rashes, eye infections and respiratory illness. Beach water quality monitoring agencies collect and analyze samples, then post the necessary health warnings to protect public health. Poor water quality not only directly threatens the health of swimmers and beachgoers, but is also directly linked to ocean-dependent economies.

Ocean water quality monitoring is vital to ensuring the health protection of the millions who recreate in coastal waters. Since the Annual Beach Report Card was first published more than twenty years ago, beachgoers throughout California have come to rely on the grades as vital public health protection tools. Now, residents and visitors of Oregon and Washington beaches will have the same critical information at their fingertips.

West Coast Beach Water Quality Overview

Most California beaches had very good to excellent water quality this past year, with 400 of 445 (90%) locations receiving very good to excellent (A and B) grades during the summer dry time period (California’s AB411 mandated monitoring from April to October). Year-round dry weather grades were also very good, with 284 of 324 (88%) locations earning A or B grades. Lower grades during year-round dry weather included 12 Cs (4%), 12 Ds (4%) and 16 Fs (5%).

Southern California (Santa Barbara through San Diego counties) summer dry (AB411) weather grades (91% A and B grades) were actually slightly better than the state average. In the San Francisco Bay Area (Marin through San Mateo counties), the summer dry weather ocean-side grades were excellent with 95% (40 of 42) of locations receiving an A or B grade. The bay-side’s water quality slipped slightly with 73% (19 of 26) A or B grades compared to 81% (21 of 26) last year. 60% (41 of 68) of these Bay Area locations were monitored frequently enough to earn year-round grades. Year-round dry weather water quality on the ocean-side was good, with 90% (18 of 20) of the monitoring locations receiving an A or B grade. It was fair on the bay-side with 67% (14 of 21) locations receiving A or B grades.

The disparity between dry and wet weather water quality continues to be dramatic, thereby demonstrating that California is not successfully reducing stormwater runoff pollution. This year’s (April 2010 – March 2011) report shows 46% of the 324 statewide locations monitored during wet weather received fair to poor (C–F) grades. In Southern California, 50% of sampling locations earned fair to poor wet weather grades. Despite higher than normal precipitation levels this past year, wet weather grades were slightly better than the seven-year average (years since new methodology implementation) for both Southern California and statewide.

While 60 locations were monitored throughout the summer in Oregon, only 13 were monitored frequently enough (at least weekly) to be considered for this report. All of Oregon’s 13 regularly monitored locations received A grades. Washington monitoring locations were also typically clean, with 93% of the 141 monitored receiving A and B grades.

California’s Dry Weather Honor Roll

Sixty-eight of the 324 beaches (21%) with year-round dry weather grades this year scored a perfect A+. These beaches had zero exceedances of state bacterial standards for ocean water quality during dry weather throughout the entire time frame of this report. These beaches demonstrated that superb water quality can be found in areas impacted by wildlife, but without anthropogenic sources of fecal bacteria. Heal the Bay proudly places these beaches on the 2010-2011 Beach Report Card Honor Roll. (A list of these locations can be found in the full report, Appendix B on Page 78.)

California Beach Bummers

Numerous California beaches vied for the Beach Bummer crown this year (the monitoring location with the poorest dry weather water quality). Four of the 10 most polluted beaches in the state were in Los Angeles County. Though most of these beaches are no strangers to the Beach Bummer list, Topanga State Beach made its first appearance since 2005-2006

Top 10 Beach Bummers (each location links to the online Beach Report Card)

  1. Cowell Beach – at the wharf (Santa Cruz County)
  2. Avalon Harbor Beach – Catalina Island (L.A. County)
  3. Cabrillo Beach – harborside (Los Angeles County)
  4. Topanga State Beach – at creek mouth (L.A. County)
  5. Poche Beach (Orange County)
  6. North Beach/Doheny (Orange County)
  7. Arroyo Burro Beach (Santa Barbara County)
  8. Baker Beach – at Lobos Creek (San Francisco County)
  9. Colorado Lagoon (Los Angeles County)
  10. Capitola Beach – west of the jetty (Santa Cruz County)

The data from Santa Barbara County through San Diego County was analyzed to determine whether there were significant differences in water quality based on beach type. As in previous years, water quality at open ocean beaches during year-round dry weather was significantly better than water quality at those beaches located within enclosed bays or harbors, or those impacted by storm drains. 99% of open ocean beaches received an A grade for year-round dry weather compared to 76% at beaches found within an enclosed bay, harbor or marina, and 76% at beaches impacted by a storm drain. The data demonstrate that visitors at open ocean beaches with no pollution source are nearly always swimming in clean water during dry weather.

Funding California’s Beach Monitoring Program

Monitoring efforts have been at risk statewide since then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 2008 lineitem veto of nearly $1 million in California beach monitoring funds. Fortunately, some municipalities have temporarily allocated additional local funding in order to provide this invaluable service to the beachgoing public. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) directed Proposition 13 Clean Beach Initiative (CBI) grant funds to backfill the beach monitoring funds from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010. In addition, federal American Recovery and Reinstatement Act (ARRA) stimulus funds were approved to cover the monitoring season through 2010. On Nov. 2, 2010, the SWRCB approved a resolution to commit $984,000 from available funds, Proposition 13 or 50, to continue the state’s beach monitoring program through the end of 2011. The SWRCB has been working with members of the Beach Water Quality Group in order to explore options for sustainable, long-term funding; as the state cannot afford to fund any of the beach monitoring program after 2011.

There is no secured state source of funding for beach monitoring in 2012 and current federal Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act funding to California (about $500,000) is woefully inadequate. A protective beach monitoring program would cost about $2 million a year for conventional analytical methods, and approximately $3 million a year if rapid methods are used at California’s most polluted beaches. Heal the Bay will continue working with the state and local governments throughout California to ensure that future funding is secured.

Although beach water quality monitoring funding has seen cutbacks before (state funding was reduced by 10% in 2007), the complete elimination of state funding in 2008 by Gov. Schwarzenegger sent a message from Sacramento to the oceangoing public that its health is not a priority. It is imperative that government officials, county and state health departments, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) strive towards a long term solution that will permanently restore funding to counties’ beach and bay water quality monitoring programs.

We have seen a marked and steady decline in the number of beaches monitored throughout California as a direct result of this funding uncertainty. Seventy-two beaches were not monitored during the summer dry (AB411) period and 47 were not monitored year-round compared to before 2008. This is equivalent to 2,770 fewer samples taken year-round compared to before 2008. Continued efforts must be made to ensure that adequate and sustainable funding becomes available for beach water quality monitoring immediately.

General Observations

Children play directly in front of storm drains and in runoff-filled ponds and lagoons. Monitoring at ‘point-zero’ (the mouth of storm drains or creeks) is the best way to ensure that the health risks to swimmers are minimized.

This is one recommendation among several that Heal the Bay has made to state officials to improve water quality monitoring and better protect public health. (A complete list of recommendations can be found at the end of the full report, page 68.)

The Beach Report Card is based on the routine monitoring of beaches conducted by local health agencies and dischargers. Water samples are analyzed for bacteria that indicate pollution from numerous sources, including fecal waste. The better the grade a beach receives, the lower the risk of illness to ocean users. The report is not designed to measure the amount of trash or toxins found at beaches. The Beach Report Card would not be possible without the cooperation of all of the shoreline monitoring agencies in California, Oregon and Washington.

Heal the Bay believes that the public has the right to know the water quality at their favorite beaches and is proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope that beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health.

Health officials and Heal the Bay recommend that beach users never swim within 100 yards on either side of a flowing storm drain, in any coastal waters during a rainstorm, and for at least three days after a storm has ended. Storm drain runoff is the greatest source of pollution to local beaches, flowing untreated to the coast and often contaminated with motor oil, animal waste, pesticides, yard waste and trash. After a rain, indicator bacteria densities often far exceed state health criteria for recreational water use.

Sponsors

A special thank you to to the following for their continued support in funding the
Beach Report Card program and the publication of the 2010-2011 annual report:

The Diller – von Furstenberg Family Foundation logo

simplehuman logo

LAcarGuy logo

SIMA logo

Grousbeck Family Foundation



After months of legal debate, San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Ernest Goldsmith ruled Oct. 27 that the proposed plan to restore impaired Malibu Lagoon can move forward. Responding to opponents’ legal challenges, the judge found that the California Coastal Commission had considered all reasonable alternatives for conducting the necessary channel reshaping of the Lagoon. He also ruled that the plan would not limit public access to the beach.

The project was supposed to begin June 1. As a result of the lawsuit, the restoration efforts will be delayed until at least the summer of 2012. The wildlife protection agencies that approved the restoration require all efforts to occur during the summer months to minimize wildlife impacts.

GET THE FACTS

  • Myth vs. FactExplore each of the misconceptions that surround the restoration of Malibu Lagoon. Note: This article is from the Spring 2011 issue of Currents, Heal the Bay’s membership newsletter.
  • The Facts Supporting the RestorationIn this video by Shifting Baselines, key voices speak up on the facts supporting the Malibu Lagoon restoration plan.
  • RestoreMalibuLagoon.orgExplore the five major misconceptions about the Malibu Lagoon restoration plan. This web site by Shifting Baselines complements the video.
  • A Clear Victory for Malibu
    Heal the Bay’s President, Mark Gold, discusses the Malibu Lagoon restoration plan at his Spouting Off blog.

The latest ruling affirmed the Coastal Commission’s 11-0 vote last year to approve  the project. In his decision, Judge Goldsmith underscored the ecological and water quality merits of the restoration plan, which was created by State Parks, the Coastal Conservancy, leading California wetland scientists, coastal engineers, landscape architects and Heal the Bay.

The State Parks project will be managed by the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission with funding from the California Coastal Conservancy.

Background

In highly urbanized Southern California, we’ve lost much of our wetland habitat and our remaining lagoons are often highly degraded. Malibu Lagoon is one of the few remaining tidal lagoons in the region and marks critical habitat for the federally endangered tidewater goby and southern steelhead trout, as well as a diversity of shorebirds. It’s a local oasis to view these treasures. But, Malibu Lagoon is in trouble. It is being clogged by sediments, has severely low dissolved oxygen levels, and is not in its natural state.

Heal the Bay cherishes the beautiful Malibu coast and understands that Malibu Lagoon is an essential part of a healthy environment. Many people have worked for decades to protect the lagoon and improve water quality throughout the Malibu Creek watershed. The area has also been heavily studied by experts at many of the state’s leading universities.

It’s clear that Malibu Lagoon is less vibrant and diverse, especially under the surface of the water, than other lagoons in Southern California, such as Bolsa Chica in Huntington Beach or the Carpinteria Salt Marsh.

Fortunately, the California Coastal Commission late last year approved carefully developed plans to restore the Lagoon and improve circulation. The restoration, guided by science and input from top wetlands ecologists throughout the state, is expected to begin this summer. Heal the Bay helped develop the plan from 2002-05 but will not be an active participant in the actual restoration.

Despite this transparent process, a small but vocal contingent of community members has raised concerns about the restoration project.  To counter some of the misconceptions being bandied about by opponents, the Shifting Baselines media project has assembled a video (see below) and web site to present the facts behind the restoration. We encourage our supporters to explore and learn.

View large version at YouTube



The movement to ban plastic bags in California scored a major victory when the Long Beach City Council voted 5-0 last night to support a disposable bag ban based on the Los Angeles County bag ordinance. Heal the Bay boardmember Suja Lowenthal spearheaded the City Council effort to ban single use plastic  bags, but Dee Andrews’ support for the ordinance was key. (Five votes were needed as there were four absences). 

Large retailers are required to stop giving out single use plastic bags by August, with smaller retailer requirements kicking in for January. Like the county’s ordinance, retailers are allowed to sell “green” paper bags for a dime as an alternative. But the message from Long Beach remains strong:  Use reusable bags instead of single use bags.

Long Beach has a lot to gain from the bag ban because the city sits at the bottom of the heavily urbanized, over 1500-square mile L.A. and San Gabriel River watersheds. As a result, Long Beach beaches bear the brunt of our society’s irresponsible waste disposal behavior.

Read more & comment» (new window)



Has education failed to reach its potentail in fighting climate change and environmental degradation? That’s the topic of a June 2nd discussion at UCLA. The discussion, led by Charles Saylan and Daniel T. Blumsein, will cover their book, The Failure of Environmental Education (And How We Can Fix It). The talk will also include a book signing.

More information

photo: michale via Flickr