Top

Heal the Bay Blog

 “Where did the river go?”

So wondered Heal the Bay’s inaugural class of Creek Week students as they finished their trek along the Los Angeles River, moving from Big Tujunga Creek down to the river’s mouth in San Pedro.

Mere days ago they’d been eagerly wading barefoot,  hunting insects through clear waters. By day four, when they’d reached Compton Creek, they found the waters marred by pervasive concrete and trash and far less inviting for bare feet and insects, which had completely disappeared.

These 56 high school students — from the Pacific American Volunteer Assn. (PAVA) — learned firsthand how the river environment is dramatically changed by human influence and pollution. Kicking off our new summertime Creek Education Program, “Creek Week,” Heal the Bay staff led two sessions in mid-July, taking students through the L.A. River and its tributary creeks, allowing them to explore an environment many had never seen.

Along the way they learned how to perform field science, documenting changes in the habitat, water chemistry, and biology along the river caused by pollution and urban runoff. From that data and experience, students were asked to think about how they can be part of protecting this environment, performing further research or creating projects that address the issues they’d seen.

Creek Week is the perfect mix of personal scientific discovery and environmental stewardship. Students who participated this summer have taken what they’ve learned and shared it with their community, presenting their findings to their peers, and even testifying before the Los Angeles City Council about the urgent need to address these environmental issues. Next summer, the program will expand to a wider audience in the hopes that many more students can become environmental leaders.

This new Heal the Bay Creek Education program focuses on local neighborhood, storm drain, and fresh-waterway issues and how they affect the overall health of the watershed and environment. Creek 101, the school-year component of the program, sees Heal the Bay staff teach lessons in various science and social science classes as part of the classroom curriculum.

Both Creek Week and Creek 101 begin with some background on watershed and riparian science, and then focus on taking students out into the environment to teach them how to perform field assessments to examine and document environmental health and impairment.

The third component of the program, Creek Projects, asks the students to take what they learned in the class and out in the field and apply it to some service learning project aimed at improving the health of their local neighborhood, waterway, or watershed.

Learn more about Creek Week from a PAVA student’s perspective.



Human beings, stingrays and sea jellies share something: We all love to swim in warm water. But that poses some problems.

As more human swimmers enter the surf during the summer, it’s more likely that we will encounter a stingray or a sea jelly. Santa Monica Fire Department Mark Bridge told the Santa Monica Daily Press that since April 1, 18 people have been stung by a sea jelly or stingray in local waters. 

But just because you encounter a stingray or a sea jelly, that doesn’t mean you’ll get stung. 

It’s important to remember that these marine species call the ocean their home and it’s as if we are barging into their living room, advises Vicki Wawerchak, director of Heal the Bay’s Santa Monica Pier Aquarium. “When we walk into the ocean, we are unexpected visitors,” she explains. “They’re not looking for our feet or ankles and we can accidentally step on them.”

The top precaution you can take, she continues, is to “educate yourself on how to coexist in their environment, especially during the summer months when so many of us are in the water. Learn what these animals look like in the sand and sea so you can avoid them.” 

For instance, it’s good to know that sea jellies can’t swim on their own; they’re pushed by the current, so it’s up to you to avoid them. And to escape being stung by the usually docile and curious stingray, shuffle your feet side-to-side and avoid normal forward stepping though the surf. 

But perhaps the best prevention is to learn more about these marine species by visiting them in a safe environment, such as the Santa Monica Pier Aquarium, which features Round Stingrays and Moon Jellies, among the more than 100 local sea animals on display.



I flew out to Washington, D.C., this week to meet with Nancy Stoner, the EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Water, to help voice environmental community concerns about the direction of the National Beach Water Quality Criteria due out in 2012. The NRDC’s Steve Fleischli, a longtime friend, joined me for the meeting with Stoner and about a dozen Office of Water staffers in the EPA East building. Other enviros from Surfrider Foundation, Heal the Bay and New Jersey’s Clean Ocean Action joined by phone.

We remain upset with the direction of the EPA draft criteria for a number of reasons. At a workshop in New Orleans earlier this year, and in a number of subsequent conference calls, EPA Office of Water staff made it clear that the proposed rules would be nearly identical to the 1986 criteria, marking almost no changes in 25 years. In some ways, the criteria will be even weaker than the 1986 version, despite more than two decades of new studies.

I had the privilege of taking the lead for the enviros in the meeting. I explained that EPA was considering an approach to beach water quality regulation that would be far less protective than California’s and would compound existing weaknesses in the 25-year-old criteria. Because I’ve spent those same 25 years working on beach water quality issues as an advocate, scientist, public health professional and legislative sponsor, I was pretty wound up.

About 50 minutes into today’s meeting, as I was attempting to make a key point, the ground started to move. Then the chandeliers started to sway.  The rock ‘n’ roll continued for nearly a minute, with some folks moving away from the light fixtures, others diving under the desk and still others crowding the door jamb.  There I stood, making a stand for greater health protection for swimmers and surfers during a 5.9 earthquake.

Photo courtesy USGS

Read more of this post »

Add a comment to this post »



El Día de Limpieza Costera de California se tomara acabo el sábado 17 de Septiembre en más de 65 sitios sobre todo el condado de Los Angeles. Habrá un sitio donde limpiar cerca de ti. Así que no agás decidía y comprométete hoy a llevar la familia entera. Da un poco de servicio a la comunidad y aprende cómo y porque el medioambiente nos afecta a todos.

Regístrate para que puedas ser parte de este gran evento.



The plastic bag giants have filed nuisance lawsuits against reusable bag manufacturer ChicoBag, as well as Marin County and the City of Long Beach for taking a stand to reduce unnecessary single use bag litter and waste. Join Heal the Bay in saying “YES” to the reusable bag movement and “NO” to plastic bags. Tell the plastic bag industry to drop these intimidation lawsuits. Sign the petition today. 

Some California cities have been cautious to pass local ordinances banning plastic bags because of threatened litigation by the “Save Our Plastic Bag Coalition,” a group composed of plastic bag manufacturers and distributors. Industry litigation and huge lobbyist pressure derailed initiatives in several cities, including Seattle, Oakland and Palo Alto. 

Despite the bullying tactics, communities continue to fight back, with new cities and counties moving forward with plastic bag bans, including the cities of Burbank and Huntington Beach. In July, the California Supreme Court ruled that the city of Manhattan Beach did not have to conduct a full environmental impact report prior to adopting a plastic bag ordinance, which the Save Our Plastic Bag Coalition had challenged.

Learn more about small business ChicoBag’s battle against the plastic bag industry at Spouting Off, the personal blog by Heal the Bay President, Mark Gold:  “Andy vs. The Plastic Goliath.” 



What could possibly beat a wild capybara emerging from the murky waters of a California sewage pond? Rodents of unusual size have a wide following. (Exhibit A: the classic Rob Reiner film “The Princess Bride.”)  And capybaras are prized as a Peruvian delicacy (Exhibit A: My food critic brother Jonathan Gold). But I’m pretty sure that the rodent in question didn’t escape from anyone’s vermin ranch.

Also, what the heck was the capybara doing in the wastewater pond to begin with?  I know the animals love water, but Amazonia is a long way from Paso Robles. And the Amazon’s pristine waterways seem a lot more appealing than poorly treated Central Coast sewage.

The settling pond photos look like something from before the dawn of sewage treatment technology.  And they are!  The plant was built in the 1950s and has not been modified since then to provide nitrogen removal.  The 3 million-gallon-a-day plant definitely needs a major overhaul and Paso Robles is considering joining the 21st century on wastewater treatment (an estimated $50M for adding filtration and denitrification).

Meanwhile, be on the lookout for rodents of unusual size in Paso Robles.

Add a comment to this post »



After a decade of disagreement about the impacts of sewage treatment plant discharges to the Santa Clara River estuary, the city of Ventura and environmental groups Ventura Coastkeeper, the Wishtoyo Foundation and Heal the Bay today jointly announced a settlement agreement to protect the estuary while increasing local water recycling.

The Santa Clara River estuary is the terminus of one of Southern California’s largest and most productive river systems.  The area is also home to the endangered southern steelhead trout and tidewater goby. The agreement will end the last direct sewage discharge to an estuary in California.

The settlement will result in at least a 50% reduction (approximately 4-5 million gallons a day) and up to a 100% reduction (8-10 million gallons per day) in treated sewage discharges to the estuary.  This tertiary-treated effluent (filtered and disinfected) will be recycled locally for irrigation and other non-potable uses. The water that doesn’t get recycled will be discharged to a treatment wetland that will further cleanse the treated wastewater.  Then, the water will flow through the wetland before being discharged to the estuary.

Read more of this post »

Add a comment to this post »



Burbank and Huntington Beach city councils voted this week to move forward with plastic bag bans, part of a growing movement of local governments taking responsibility for ending the environmental and economic waste caused by plastic pollution. The moves comein the wake of Long Beach, Manhattan Beach, Calabasas and  Los Angeles County passing similar ordinances over the past two years.

The Burbank City Council agreed to advance a plastic bag ban that will likely start with large grocery stores, while Huntington Beach’s council voted for city staff to develop a new law that would ban stores from using plastic bags and instead replace them with reusable bags. 

Members of the Huntington Beach city staff were also directed to coordinate with other organizations to create an educational program to bring about a change of attitude about plastic bags.

Kreigh Hampel, recycling coordinator for the city of Burbank, told the Burbank Leader: “When you talk about plastic bags, about 500 to 600 bags are used per person, per year, according to Los Angeles County,” Hampel said. “If there are 110,000 people in Burbank, and they use 550 bags, that’s 60.5 million bags.”

In July, California’s Supreme Court upheld a city’s right to restrict the usage of plastic bags.

 



For the last three months, I’ve been yearning to blog or write an op-ed on AB 376, the state bill that would ban the sale of shark fins in California. I haven’t been more excited about a marine conservation bill in nearly a decade.  But to be honest, having an environmental biologist like me write about shark conservation wouldn’t add much momentum to get the bill passed.

After all, nearly every major environmental and animal rights group in the nation strongly supports the bill.  Many of these groups persuaded globally known actors like Leonardo DiCaprio and January Jones to advocate for the bill via Twitter and op-eds. Even the Monterey Bay Aquarium, generally neutral on environmental bills, decided to sponsor the bill and hire well-respected lobbyists to fight for shark conservation.

The one person I know that could really make a difference in the fight to enact the shark fin ban is my brother, Jonathan.  After all, there is no food writer more highly respected nationally than Jonathan.  He’s the only food writer to earn a Pulitzer and he’s received seven James Beard Awards, the food industry’s equivalent of the Oscars.

Also, Jonathan’s writing delves into both the worlds of food and modern culture.  His writing on Chinese food is particularly distinct and well respected, as nearly every significant Chinese restaurant in the San Gabriel Valley has a copy of one of his reviews plastered on a window or framed in the lobby.

Unlike my brother, I’ve never consumed shark fin soup.  In fact, I remember threatening his physical harm at a Monterey Park Cantonese seafood palace that actually had a cart featuring the item for $30 a bowl back in the1990s.  Jonathan eagerly called the cart driver to our table just to get a rise out of me.  He thought it was hilarious.  I wasn’t laughing.

Read more of this post»

Add a comment to this post»



An adult female sea lion was found dead on Venice Beach on August 3. She had been shot three times.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Office of Law Enforcement is investigating the shooting, as killing a marine mammal is a violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which can result in a $100,000 fine and a year in prison.

It can be difficult to track down the perpetrators because the crime typically occurs far out at sea where there are few witnesses. Animals attacked may travel miles from the scene of the crime before washing up on shore.

Marine Animal Rescue is offering a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of whomever killed this sea lion. According to Marine Animal Rescue, some fishermen have been known to kill seals, sea lions and pelicans because they view them as a threat to their livelihoods. Some shoot the animals while others use “California seal control devices,” otherwise known as seal bombs.

Those with information about the shooting or any other violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act can contact the NOAA Office of Law Enforcement hotline 24 hours a day, seven days a week at (800) 853-1964.

In addition, sea lions are threatened by domoic acid, a powerful neurotoxin produced by a specific group of microscopic algae that sometimes blooms in coastal waters. Marine mammals such as sea lions eating fish laden with toxin can ingest sufficient domoic acid in the stomachs of their prey to experience symptoms of domoic acid poisoning. These symptoms can include a variety of neurological disorders including disorientation and seizures, and in severe cases, death.

The Marine Mammal Center in Northern California provides a seven-step guide to what to do if you find a stranded marine mammal.