Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Category: Locations

Editor’s note: Roberta Brown is a Santa Monica-based writer, fight choreographer and mother (three vocations that she says go surprisingly well together). She is the West Coast Editor for Nickelodeon’s ParentsConnect.

I think I may have actually done a happy dance when I found out that the Santa Monica Pier Aquarium is launching its own summer camp this year. What I know for sure is that I booked my son a spot right way.

I suppose I should confess to a slight bias: we LOVE the aquarium. We love its perfect size (big enough to fascinate kids, small enough for parents to relax); its fabulous staff (with knowledge and enthusiasm in huge, equal parts); its escape-artist octopus (who probably didn’t mean to flood the place a few years back); its frisky sharks (who never fail to spray out-of-town relatives); and its brand-new, mesmerizing sea horses. When my son was in preschool we always entered the fray to get into those Reggio-esque Micro Biologist classes – arguably the single best drop-off class for 3 to 5-year-olds in town. My preschooler came home able to articulate the differences between sea mammals and big fish, the many uses of seaweed and how to tell a sea lion from a seal. (Can you??)

As he approached the age of no return for those classes, we were sad to discover that – at least at the time – only the littlest tykes were lucky enough to get the behind-the-scenes, inside story on all things aquarium. The following year we had to get our aquarium fix with a birthday party there.

But back to that happy dance, we found out a few weeks ago that this summer the aquarium is offering a summer camp. We’re in, out, and around this summer, so we opted for the occasional day option, but I’m already imagining those days: I drop my son off so that he can learn more about the ocean in a few hours than I’ve managed to learn in 40-something years, then I go open my laptop to work in that quiet, breezy room at the Annenberg Beach House that I’ve been promising myself since it opened. Later I pick up my son, who is beached-out and educated all in one go, and I feel like a hero treating him to an ice cream at the carousel. Or maybe on Thursday we follow up camp with a picnic and a concert on the pier. That’s more summery than corn on the cob.
 
And when it’s all over, when all the sand has been brushed off all the feet, maybe he can finally clarify for me the difference between a seal and a sea lion.

-Roberta Brown

Editor’s note: Limited spaces are still available in the Santa Monica Pier Aquarium Summer Camp and will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis. Learn more about the Science Adventures Camp and register online now.



Our Stream Team recently discovered some illegal dumping going on in Cold Creek in the Malibu Creek watershed. A very large amount of yard waste and woody debris had been dumped off from Piuma Road into the stream channel.

When yard waste is left to decay within a creek it can lead to a variety of water quality impacts. The decomposition process consumes oxygen, which can lead to the suffocation of aquatic species. Also, during the decomposition process, nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphate are released, which can result to an unhealthy build up of algae.

Not only does dumping yard waste into a creek have a multitude of adverse affects on its water quality and biological communities, it is also illegal.

Learn more (CalabasasPatch post featuring letter and photos by Kevin Jontz, Stream Team Monitoring Specialist).



This week Chile joined the ranks of the many nations that have banned the practice of shark finning. Shark finning is a brutal process. Sharks’ fins are sliced off and the sharks are then thrown back overboard where they bleed to death, are eaten by other animals or drown. Sharks now caught in Chilean waters will be required to be landed with fins naturally attached.

Millions of sharks are killed annually for their fins, which are often used in shark fin soup. Other nations that have banned the practice of shark finning include Palau, the Maldives, Honduras, the Bahamas, India, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Malta, Mexico, Namibia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Oman, Panama, Portugal, Romania, Samoa, Scotland, Seychelles, Slovenia, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan and the Untied States, according to Oceana.

Despite this great news, we still need your help to pass AB 376, the bill to ban the sale of shark fin products here in California.

More information (USA Today article).

Photo: Stormydog via Flickr



Scientists recently compared the waters off California to Africa’s Serengeti Plain, famous for its abundance of wildlife.  The California Current eco-system is home to many species. Scientists tagged and tracked more than 4,000 animals and found that the Current is very important to the ocean’s top predators, such as sharks and whales.

Learn more about the “Main Street” of the north Pacific Ocean.

Photo: Kohane via Flickr



Yesterday, the California Department of Fish and Game boldly approved the official initiation of the Southern California Marine Protected Area (MPA) network. Despite the ongoing threat of litigation from fishing industry opponents, the Commission approved the October 1st start date by a 4-1 vote.

This means that the SoCal MPA network requirements will be enforceable starting this October. Fish and Game, along with community groups, environmental groups, aquaria, educational institutions, and the many groups that have been following the MPA process over the past several years, need to really focus on public education over the summer. In particular, a targeted effort on educating the wide-ranging fishing and broader ocean user community is critical for two reasons: 1 – to dispel fears of use restrictions in MPAs (for example – non-consumptive uses like surfing, diving and kayaking are NOT limited); and 2 – to provide accurate information on the consumptive use (fishing) restrictions in marine reserves (no take of any marine life) and marine conservation areas (limited take – usually affecting only the commercial fishing industry).

Meanwhile, Heal the Bay will continue its research on how the Malibu MPAs and adjacent coastal waters are used by visitors and commercial fishermen. This baseline data will prove critical as a point of comparison to assess changes in consumptive and non-consumptive uses in the new MPAs and adjacent waters.  If you’re interested in walking Malibu’s beaches and observing and tracking uses for this research effort, visit our site to get involved.

The recent Census of Marine Life findings that the CA Current has incredibly rich species diversity, equivalent to the Serengheti of the sea, as well as the International Earth System Expert Workshop results warning of pending marine species collapse, show the importance of these MPAs.

As the new MPAs take effect this fall, we should celebrate this historic move to help safeguard SoCal’s ocean economy and environment for the future.

Read more & comment» (new window)



Heal the Bay’s Santa Monica Pier Aquarium joins more than 1,000 museums across the country this summer as a member of Blue Star Museums, a program offering free admission to all active duty military personnel and their families from Memorial Day through Labor Day 2011.  

Blue Star Museums is a collaboration of the National Endowment of the Arts, 1,300 museums nationwide and Blue Star Families. Blue Star Families is a national, nonpartisan, nonprofit network of military families from all ranks and services, including guard and reserve, with a mission to support, connect and empower military families. 

The free admission program is available to active-duty military and their immediate family members (military ID holder and five immediate family members).  Active duty military include Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard and active duty National Guard and active duty Reserve members.

The Aquarium is open regular weekend hours, 12:30 to 6:00 p.m. on July 2nd and 3rd, closed on Monday, July 4th.

View other museums participating in the Blue Star program.

Photo: brittanylynae via Flickr



Tonight, the Malibu City Council will vote to approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the city and the state to move the civic center’s wastewater management into the 21st century. Malibu fought to become a city when L.A. County tried to jam a massive sewage treatment plan in pristine Corral Canyon down their throat. For the last two decades, the tradition of fighting for septics over sewers has been a city obsession.

The MOU vote tonight will greatly weaken the Regional Water Board’s order prohibiting land disposal of sewage (leach fields) by 2015 in commercial areas and 2019 in the civic center’s residential areas. Since the State Water Board upheld the Regional Board’s order last December, Malibu and the Regional Board have been meeting regularly to weaken it.

Malibu opposed the original order, but they didn’t sue over it because the State Board was willing to modify its terms. One of the order’s big issues was the inclusion of residential areas like Malibu Knolls and Sweetwater Mesa, which likely had no water quality impacts on the highly polluted Malibu Lagoon and Surfrider Beach. If those were the only changes, then a simple MOU modifying the order would have been universally supported. But this is Malibu, so nothing is ever simple.

Read more & comment » (new window)



Attention shoppers! Effective Friday, July 1, 2011, large supermarkets and pharmacies in Los Angeles County’s unincorporated areas are not allowed to distribute single use plastic
bags.

More Information

Share

Questions?

  • Call 310.451.1500, x116

Approved by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on November 16, 2010, the ban prohibits the distribution of single-use plastic shopping bags
at grocery stores, convenience stores and pharmacies in unincorporated
areas, which encompass some 1 million residents and 65% of the county.

The ban is intended to promote the use of reusable bags over single use plastic and paper carryout bags in order to reduce the negative economic and environmental impacts associated with single use bags.

The county is now the largest municipality in the nation to ban plastic
bags and has spurred a substantial amount of interest in this issue with many jurisdictions are contemplating similar actions. Some cities within Los Angeles County who have already passed similar ordinances are: Malibu, Long Beach, Santa Monica, and Calabasas.

Heal the Bay has led the legislative fight to enact a bag ban for
more than five years as part of its ongoing efforts to tackle plastic
pollution in California seas and neighborhoods.

Learn more! (on this page)


FAQ’s about the L.A. County Bag Ban

Why ban bags now?

  • Californians use more than 19 billion plastic grocery and merchandise bags each year, roughly 552 bags per person. This usage generates 147,038 tons of unnecessary waste — enough to stretch around the globe over 250 times.
  • Californians throw away over 600 plastic bags per second.
  • California taxpayers spend millions to collect and landfill plastic bag waste each year. That figure does not include external costs, e.g. resource extraction and depletion, quality of life issues, economic loss due to plastic bag litter.
  • U.S. consumers use 100 billion plastic bags annually, which are all made from fossil fuels.

Where does the ban apply?

The ban would include neighborhoods in Los Angeles County unincorporated areas. The areas that are not part of the 88 cities considered to be unincorporated L.A. County. More than 65% of Los Angeles County is unincorporated. For the 1 million people living in these areas, the Board of Supervisors and County Departments provide the municipal services.

Are all plastic carry out bags banned?

Yes. Plastic carryout bags are any bag made predominantly of plastic (either petroleum or a biologically-based source, such as corn or other plants) provided to a customer at the cash register.

Will I get a paper bag instead?

During manufacturing, both paper and plastic bags emit global warming gases, create water pollution and use raw materials and energy. Paper is not the answer. If you didn’t bring a reusable bag and you must have a bag, you will have to buy a paper bag for 10 cents.

  • The paper bags must be 100% recyclable and contain a minimum of 40% postconsumer recycled material and display the word “Recyclable” in a highly visible manner on the outside of the bag.

What do I put my green beans and meat in?

The ban does not include produce bags or product bags. That means any bag without handles used exclusively to carry produce, meats, bread or other food items to the cash register, will not be included in the ban.

What happens to the 10 cents collected by the store?

Monies collected by a store for paper bags will be retained by the store and may be used only for:

  • Costs associated with complying with the requirements of the ban
  • Actual costs of providing recyclable paper carryout bags
  • Costs associated with a store’s educational materials or education campaign encouraging the use of reusable bags

What if I can’t afford reusable bags?

All stores must provide bags free of charge to any customer participating either in the California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children or in the Supplemental Food Program

What stores are covered by the ban?

Hopefully you will make the choice to use reusable bags everywhere, but plastic carry out bags will no longer be available at any of the following retail establishments located within the unincorporated area of the County:

  • Supermarkets
  • Large retail pharmacies
  • Liquor stores and food marts

Why Replace Plastic Grocery Bags With Reusable Bags?

  • Each year, approximately 6 billion plastic bags are consumed in Los Angeles County. This is equivalent to 600 bags per person per year.
  • Approximately 150,000 tons of plastic bags are disposed by Los Angeles County residents each year.
  • Disposable bags cost our cities up to 17 cents per bag for disposal.
    Plastic bags are made from fossil fuels. Americans use over 380 billion bags every year, wasting this precious resource.
  • Alternatives such as reusable bags are readily available and affordable.
  • Some areas of the Pacific Ocean contain six times more plastic debris than zooplankton (the fundamental base of our food chain.) These tiny pieces of plastic are eaten by zooplankton and move up the food chain, potentially presenting health risks for humans.

Benefits of Implementing Widespread Use of Reusable Bags

  • Significant cost savings to taxpayers – less money spent on litter cleanup, enforcement, prevention
  • Fewer plastic bags littering our community
  • Fewer impacts to the marine environment (marine wildlife, such as sea turtles and whales ingest littered plastic bags, that they mistake for food)
  • Fewer natural resources consumed


Editor’s Note: Vicki Wawerchak, director of the Santa Monica Pier Aquarium, chronicles the process of preparing two sea lion skulls and one harbor seal skull to become marine artifacts on exhibit at the aquarium. This is the second installment of her story of the process. (Read part one: “An Unusual Jackpot“).

I love sharks. I really can’t get enough of them. A previous job allowed me to swim with blues and makos both in and out of a cage, and I recently felt the size of a flea as I swam next to a pregnant 35-foot whale shark in the Galapagos. I’ve had the opportunity to swim with oceanic white tips and nurse sharks and I’m waiting for the day when I can get into a cage to observe the almighty landlord, a white shark.

But…put me in the same room as a bug and I am not a happy person. Not all bugs, mind you, but most of them. Oh sure, I appreciate their ecological niche and the role they play in the overall food web but that is about as far my appreciation goes. So the thought of having a bug box here to slowly work on removing skin and tissue from our newly donated skulls, made me a bit nervous. Jose [Bacallao, the aquarium’s senior aquarist] and I talked about using dermestid beetle colonies as a method of prep and even referenced the great job the California Science Center did on making a whole exhibit surrounding this subject. Could we make an exhibit out of this too? Should we just keep it behind the scenes? Either way, I couldn’t stop thinking about what would happen if the beetle box broke and the colony was left to run amok in the aquarium waiting for my arrival. But scientifically, I knew that if this were the best method of prep, I would get over it. We both decided to wait for our artifacts to arrive so we could see the skull size we would be working with and how much flesh and skin needed to be removed.

Again, I sat by the window jumping at every squeaky-braked truck I heard outside my office in anticipation of the Fed Ex truck. I was channeling Ralphie from “A Christmas Story” waiting for my official Red Ryder, carbine action, 200-shot range model air rifle.  As I counted down the days for my delivery, I read the Marine Mammal Skeletal Preparation and Articulation document that was passed to me by our friends at The Marine Mammal Center. This helped me weigh the pros and cons of the various prep techniques and helped us narrow the options. At last, my delivery truck arrived with a cooler and we wheeled it into the back and opened it, exposing the contents.

“Oh gosh….it looks like a scene from Dexter.”

No one said science was pretty.

Wrapped in baggies were three frozen skulls with skin, fur and other features in tact. (I truly never overlook the fact that these were once alive, swimming around in the ocean and I keep that thought and respect for these animals with me always.) We studied the skulls in detail–measuring up their size, observing thickness of the skin and examining the amount of fur we would have to work through to get a clean skull. We put them back in the freezer and brainstormed what we would do next.

We began to consider maceration, removing tissue by soaking the skulls in liquid. Freshwater maceration didn’t seem like the answer—this method consists of removing flesh prior to fresh water submersion as well as continued monitoring of water level in buckets. Boiling also seemed to be out of the question as it usually follows maceration. We also thought it would be difficult to find a kitchen that wouldn’t mind hosting us and filling their space with a, er, lingering odor. Burying the skulls would be tough. Living under a pier, something else might get to it first and beetles, with all my feelings aside, didn’t seem like the right choice for us either. Instead, the light bulb went off and since we are surrounded by salt water we decided to go the way of saltwater maceration. 
 

(For how to clean a skull, read part three )

 

Photo: jkirkhart35 via Flickr



The media spotlight at the California Coastal Commission hearing Thursday will be on the fate of a complex of mansions proposed by U2 guitarist The Edge on pristine chaparral and coastal sage habitat in the Santa Monica Mountains overlooking the Bay.  Although the “Joshua Tree” concert at the Sports Arena in 1987 was one of the best performances I’ve ever attended (I still get chills when I hear the intro to “Where the Streets Have No Name”), Heal the Bay is very critical of the project’s impacts on Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area, the lack of Low Impact Development (LID) requirements to capture and reuse or infiltrate rainwater on site, and the complete lack of information on wastewater treatment and disposal.

Despite the attention on the Edge’s project, a far more critical Coastal Commission vote will take place on Thursday regarding Malibu Valley Farms.  In this case, the project applicant had the nerve to build a horse ranch in and directly adjacent to Stokes Canyon Creek, a tributary to Malibu Creek, which drains to the highly polluted and popular Malibu Lagoon and Surfrider Beach.

The developer built the ranch in this environmentally sensitive riparian area, with concrete and dirt crossings in the creek (instead of much more environmentally friendly bridges) without permission from the Coastal Commission, and then had the gall to ask for an after-the-fact permit.  What did the Commission do in response to this illegal development?  Did members bring down the hammer of enforcement?  Absolutely not!

Read more & comment» (new window)