Top

Heal the Bay Blog

This fact sheet is presented in partnership with the Surfrider Foundation.

Together, we’re committed to protecting Southern California’s waters.


Background:

The City of Hermosa Beach has a moratorium in place that prohibits oil drilling. After years of legal battles, a settlement was reached between E&B Natural Resources and the City of Hermosa Beach that could potentially allow the community to be opened up to oil drilling by putting the moratorium up for reconsideration. Hermosa Beach residents will vote March 3, 2015, on a ballot measure to allow slant-drilling into the Bay. E&B Natural Resources wants to erect an 87-foot drilling rig and up to 34 wells on a 1.3-acre plot in a residential neighborhood, extracting up to 8,000 barrels of oil each day by slant-drilling under the seafloor and surrounding beach communities. E&B had an existing lease arrangement before the current moratorium was put in place.

If voters repeal the existing moratorium, the City would have to pay $3.5 million to E&B, and the company would pursue permitting for the proposed oil drilling operation. If voters uphold the moratorium, drilling would be barred. But the city would have to pay $17.5 million to E&B under a complex settlement brokered by past city councils.

MYTH: This is a relatively small project that only affects a small slice of the Bay and really is an issue for Hermosa Beach to decide.

FACT: Oil spills know no boundaries. With nearly 50 million annual visits to Santa Monica Bay beaches and a coastal economy worth over $10 billion, a spill off Hermosa Beach would be a financial and ecological nightmare for all of Los Angeles.

oil covered plastic bottle on beachSlant-drilling into the Santa Monica Bay from Hermosa poses significant environmental and economic risks throughout Los Angeles County and the entire Bay. This project would also be precedent-setting: There are no drilling projects currently accessing oil under the Bay. Slant-drilling from onshore under offshore waters raises many of the same concerns as any other offshore oil drilling project, in terms of increasing the risk of a coastal oil spill, causing air and water pollution and contributing to global climate change. The proposed drilling operation is only six blocks from the beach. If a spill cannot be contained, oil will ultimately reach the Santa Monica Bay and surrounding communities.

MYTH: Given all the new technology, there’s really very little chance of an oil spill actually happening.

FACT: A revised EIR (Environmental Impact Report) states that there is a 12% chance of an oil spill from the proposed project.

Oil spills have the potential to significantly impact marine life and habitats in the Bay and throughout the Southern California Bight because they can spread rapidly over great distances and can be difficult to detect and clean up. A 12% chance of a spill is simply not worth the risk. An oil spill that originated in El Segundo in the 1990s reached Malibu Lagoon, and the infamous 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill spread along the coast for more than 35 miles. Furthermore, any oil spill is likely to have an impact on tourism and the coastal economy. Our state and local community has made significant investments to protect and enhance marine and coastal habitats in the Bay, such as establishing marine protected areas in Malibu, Palos Verdes and Catalina Island; restoring Malibu Lagoon; Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission’s National Estuary Program; and the planned restoration of Ballona Wetlands. An oil spill would directly undermine these long-term efforts.

MYTH: Hermosa Beach will reap a great deal of economic benefit if drilling moves forward.

FACT: The royalties proposed by E&B Oil may seem attractive in theory, but they are theoretical and wildly speculative.

Oil spill in city street

The final cost benefit analysis (CBA) and supplement added in January 2015 show a significant drop from initial revenue estimates for Hermosa Beach from the proposed project. Projections state that only $25 million to $77 million could go toward the city’s general fund over the 35 year life of the project—less than $1 million per year. And that’s with the price of oil pegged up to $95 per barrel. With current oil prices at about $40-$45 per barrel, revenue to the city’s general fund may only equate to half that income. Additionally, should the project be approved, the CBA estimates that the project will cost the city $19 million to $26 million to relocate the City Yard where the operation would be sited, remove contaminated soil from the site and to displace a revenue-generating storage facility.

In addition to the substantial project costs cited above, the CBA predicts a 10% drop in property values for home near the drilling site should voters approve Measure O.

But there are no guarantees when it comes to oil exploration. No one can accurately predict the productivity of proposed wells. Furthermore, the use of royalty payments is highly restricted, given that the majority of the revenue will come from drilling in the Tidelands. State law blocks vast majority of funding on services like police and street improvements. Despite promises of the project being a boon for local schools, according to the updated supplement to the CBA reflecting current oil barrel prices, the Hermosa Beach City School District is only projected to receive net revenues of approximately $900,000 over the 35-year life of the project. That pencils out to be about $26,000 annually—enough to cover the education costs of less than five Hermosa students. This is a small benefit when weighed against the health risks associated with drilling in a residential area.

MYTH: Hermosa Beach can’t afford to pay a $17.5 million penalty to E&B if voters uphold the moratorium.

FACT: The city has already set aside $6 million for this purpose, and staff is researching other fiscally prudent ways to pay the remainder of the $17.5 million over time that would not put undue hardship on city budgets.

The city’s cost-benefit analysis estimates loan payments to be roughly $750,000 to $800,000 annually (over 30 years). That amount totals about 3% of the City’s annual budget – not an insignificant amount, but certainly not enough to cause severe financial stress. The study also estimates that if a payment plan was based on levying taxpayers, the average cost would be $150 a year on the average home price of $1 million—a modest insurance policy against the almost-incalculable financial burden of an oil spill. However, in a financial presentation provided by City of Hermosa Beach experts at the Hermosa City Council meeting on January 27, 2015, it was clearly stated that the City does not need to raise taxes to pay E&B if Measure O is defeated. In fact, there are compelling indications in the new supplement to the cost-benefit analysis that Measure O’s defeat would actually be less costly than its passage.

MYTH: The drilling operations will pose very few risks to community health.

FACT: Noxious gasses released from the site may cause air pollution and odor issues, which have led to respiratory problems, eye and skin irritation, headaches and other ailments in communities where oil drilling already occurs.

Activist in Hazmat suit at hearing Keep Hermosa Hermosa Campaign to Stop Oil DrillingHermosa Beach is the most densely populated coastal community in California, with about 13,670 people per square mile. It also attracts nearly 4 million visitors annually. The proposed project site lies in close proximity to schools, parks, neighborhoods, trails, businesses, and the beach. Thus, public health impacts are a major concern for Hermosa Beach residents and visitors alike. The Health Impact Report was finalized in September 2014, and other studies of the potential health risks posed by oil drilling operations elsewhere cite heightened rates of respiratory ailments and depression. The H.I.A. identifies a 28% increase in nitrogen dioxide, which is associated with asthma in children. Noise and other quality-of-life issues also pose a community health concern, as drilling operations are proposed to occur day and night. Seniors, children, and people with existing medical conditions represent the populations most vulnerable to these health threats.

MYTH: The proposed drilling operation raises few safety concerns.

FACT: Nearly half of Hermosa Beach residents live within a half mile of the proposed drilling site. The project would have significant negative impacts on safety, aesthetics, odors, wildlife, water quality and noise.

Drilling would occur within 100 feet of homes, businesses, and widely used greenspace, which raises serious health and safety concerns. For comparison’s sake, homes, businesses, and schools in Dallas are protected from oil drilling by a 1,500-foot setback requirement. Oil drilling operations can also be dangerous and have caused blowouts and hazardous spills in other communities. The Environmental Impact Report asserts that the project would have significant unavoidable impacts in 9 areas: aesthetics, air quality (odors), biological resources (wildlife), water quality (spills into subsurface soils/or ocean through storm drains), land use (open and residential spaces), noise, recreation, safety and risk of upset (e.g. blowout during drilling). The project also has the potential to threaten the municipal water supply, exacerbate seismic instability, and cause subsidence (caving in or sinking of land from drilling activities).

MYTH: The drilling operations will not affect the aesthetics and livability of surrounding neighborhoods

FACT: The proposed slant drilling operation introduces a major industrial use that raises compatibility concerns with Hermosa Beach’s family-friendly and artistic community character.

Surfer covered in oilThe oil project would occur within 10 feet of heavily trafficked Valley Drive, and less than 100 feet from homes, businesses, and the Hermosa Valley Greenbelt. The 87-foot drill rig and associated 110-foot work over rig will introduce a visually dominant, industrial feature to the community of Hermosa Beach. And, although they will not be permanent features, E&B proposes to use them for drilling and redrilling efforts over the 35-year lifespan of the project. A 35-foot wall will permanently surround the site in attempt to buffer noise impacts. Additionally, traffic is a major community concern. E&B estimates an additional 10,500 miles of heavy truck traffic during the first 10 months of construction alone, and 32 truck trips daily during subsequent phases of the project.

MYTH: Los Angeles County already has numerous oil wells, so there is precedent of safe drilling in the region.

FACT: Although there are many oil wells throughout Los Angeles County, safety remains a concern with all forms of oil drilling in densely populated regions.

10,000-gallon crude oil spill in Atwater Village looked 'like a lake'On May 15, 2014, 10,000 gallons of crude oil spilled in Atwater Village, Glendale, when an above-ground pipeline burst, sending a geyser 20 to 50 feet into the air. In March, Wilmington had crude oil running down its residential streets due to a ruptured pipe. Communities elsewhere along the California coast, like Goleta and Carpinteria, have successfully fought slant-drilling proposals. Most recently, the City of Carson rejected a bid by Occidental Petroleum to drill within city limits. The proposed operation in Hermosa Beach poses great risk to the economic, environmental and community health of the Santa Monica Bay and the greater Los Angeles region. Allowing drilling to take place underneath the seafloor in Hermosa Beach would set a terrible precedent for future protection of Santa Monica Bay. It opens the door for further exploitation of one of our region’s greatest natural resources and recreational havens.


What can you do to prevent oil drilling from taking place in Santa Monica Bay?

Check out our Hermosa Activist’s Toolkit.

Looking for citations? Contact us.



We now have a better understanding of why sea lion pups began stranding themselves on Santa Monica Bay beaches last year, writes staff scientist Dana Murray.

An emaciated sea lion pup looks lost on a Santa Monica beach. Lying motionless near the shore, he doesn’t look like he’s doing very well. The pup’s bony spine and ribs are visible through his tan skin. Concerned passers-by  wonder why he isn’t with his mother. Feeling helpless, they ask what can be done to help this poor animal.

This disturbing scene was a far-too-common sight last spring on our shorelines. Hundreds of sea lion pups, babies younger than a year old, found themselves isolated and starving on our beaches. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration would declare the strandings an “unusual mortality event,” or “UME,” in Southern California.

After months of mystery, we now have a better idea of what caused this unfortunate event.

This past week NOAA released the results of their research, which indicates that the large number of stranded, malnourished pups can be attributed in part to a decrease in the availability of prey for nursing mother sea lions, specifically sardines.  Lack of high quality, close-by food sources was the culprit – not disease, or radiation from Fukushima (as some might have speculated).

Indeed, evidence shows that sardine spawning grounds shifted further offshore locally in 2012 and 2013, making it harder for mama sea lions to catch their food. Many female California sea lions couldn’t provide adequate milk to nourish their pups, resulting in premature weaning. However, NOAA is still investigating other causes as well.

Stay tuned for more information as it develops. And a reminder: if you do encounter seals or sea lions on our shores this summer, remember to keep people and pets at least 100 feet away from the animal. Do not pour water or sand on the sea lion. You can call local marine mammal rescuers at 310-458-WILD.

During the previous stranding, Heal the Bay fielded dozens of calls from the public and networked with our many partners to help out.

Facilities such as the Marine Mammal Care Center in San Pedro soon became full of these baby sea lions. A few months later, other animals such as elephant seals had no space to go for rehabilitation when they started showing up sick and injured. As a result, Heal the Bay worked with major donors and foundations to help fund the construction of a new facility for injured and sick elephant seals at the California Wildlife Center in Malibu.

These fine organizations still need help, so support them if you can.



Kirsten James, Heal the Bay’s science and policy director for water quality, writes that there are a number of reasons to celebrate a recent win in the fight against toxic local waterbodies.

At the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board hearing last week (May 8), something big happened.  An important decision didn’t draw large crowds (only a few high paid attorneys) or make headline news, but it marked an uplifting win for local water quality standards, something that Heal the Bay has been waiting for since 2003.  Let’s start at the beginning.

The Los Angeles Basin Plan – the document that helps guide our region’s water quality protection – requires that surface waters be maintained free of substances in concentrations that are toxic.  So the permits that regulate discharges from wastewater treatment facilities contained numeric toxicity limits for many years to make sure the discharge didn’t make aquatic life die or have non-lethal impacts (for you “Simpsons” fans, think of Blinky).  With the plethora of chemicals being discharged into our wastewater systems, toxicity tests act as a safety net in the permitting system.

However the real-world effectiveness of these toxicity standards fell into question when the Los Angeles County Sanitation District petitioned its permit to the State Water Board in 2003, and the State Board punted on a decision to actually put any teeth into enforcement.  From that point on, permits in our region and others in the state were modified to remove toxicity limits. The watered-down regulations employed a weak “trigger” for regulatory oversight, which basically led to no consequences — even if a discharge could kill aquatic life.

Mugu Lagoon and Calleguas Creek

Aerial view of Mugu Lagoon and Calleguas Creek in Ventura County

Meanwhile in 2005, the Regional Board developed a numeric pollution limit (TMDLs) for discharges to Calleguas Creek in Ventura County. Chlorpyrifos, diazinon and other pesticides and toxicants were causing toxicity in the water body.  However, the Regional Board held off on putting the limits in permits because of the State Board indecision.

Frustrated with the State Board’s indecision, the resulting weak permits and the lack of implementation of the TMDL, Heal the Bay released a report in 2009 titled License to Kill that explored the repercussions of failing to include numeric limits in the permits.  Analyzing the data from 2000-08, we found hundreds of instances of toxicity and very little repercussions for polluting our waters. Essentially that meant little to no follow-up from dischargers and no enforcement by the Regional Water Board.

The report prompted the release of a draft statewide toxicity policy (with a proposed numeric limit) back in 2010.  Heal the Bay has attended many hearings and workshops and submitted extensive comments on the 2010 draft and a number of other drafts over the last few years.  Despite our urging and the prompting of environmental groups, fishing groups and others, the State Board has sat on the policy. They have allowed toxic discharges to continue to inland waters with practically no repercussions for the last 11 years.

So last week, our Regional Water Board got tired of waiting and could not justify continuing with the weak toxicity “trigger” regulatory approach.   They unanimously adopted three wastewater treatment facility permits (Camarillo Water Reclamation Plant, Thousand Oaks Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plan and Simi Valley Water Reclamation Facility) with a numeric toxicity limit.

The Regional Board took a prudent step forward to protect water quality and its members should be commended.  I recognize that there are many competing priorities for the State Water Board – most recently drought response.  However, this does not excuse potentially allowing toxic discharge to our state’s waterbodies for so many years.  The State Board should adopt statewide numeric toxicity limits, as was done in the three local permits, and not expose our waterbodies to toxic discharge any longer.   Hopefully the Regional Board action can serve as the catalyst needed to move the State Board forward on the long overdue state toxicity policy.  Aquatic life has suffered long enough.



We celebrated Earth Day last Saturday with about 1,800 friends who cleaned the beach on the North side of the Santa Monica Pier, picking up more than 600 pounds of trash. Some also built sand castles and visited our Santa Monica Pier Aquarium – and a few capped the day with a cold Heal the Bay IPA.

Thanks to Stephen Supernor and his AmeriCorps group of Team Blue 4-Pacific region volunteers who provided help toting supplies and giving safety talks for the beach cleanup.  

Time Warner Cable’s Connect a Million Minds sponsored the family sand castle building contest, allowing us to provide everyone with those essential tools: a bucket and shovel. 

Kudos to our Corporate partners who took sandcastle-building to another level. The following nine firms participated: ARC Engineering, Bernards, Gensler, HOK, Pivot, REI, RTKL, Steinberg Architects and Tangram.

In the Aquarium, underwater photographer Richard Salas took us all along on his dives from Mexico to the Equator, sharing awe-inspiring photographs and accompanying stories.

Looking ahead, we’re thankful to Union Bank for renewing support for Coastal Cleanup Day.



The time has come to cast your ballots!

Attention film buffs: Our Stoked on the Coast Student Film Festival is closed to new submissions but OPEN for public voting between now and midnight, Saturday, September 12. Please share the link and encourage your friends to vote!

VOTE NOW!

 

 

Stoked on the Coast Student Film Festival Background

Supported by a generous grant from the California Coastal Conservancy, Stoked on the Coast is a new kind of film festival organized by Heal the Bay staff. As we’re firm believers in the wisdom of children, the contest is only open to students from 5th grade through age 21. We’re inviting young auteurs throughout California to submit a short film (from six seconds to three minutes) that tells the story of why they’re passionate about the ocean. It can be straightforward or silly, meditative or madcap, narrative or stream-of-conscious — it just needs to be authentic.

 

“This contest gives us a unique perspective on marine conservation: By seeing how the ocean creatively inspires young people, we can better channel that energy into the next generation of stewards,” says Meredith McCarthy, our programs director.

It wouldn’t be a festival without pomp and circumstance, so we’ll be hosting a special Stoked on the Coast soiree later this summer. All entries will be screened, and a variety of prizes will be awarded by celebrity judges. Ultimately, every Stoker is a winner.

Learn more about the festival and enter your films here.

Get stoked, and please share with educators, young film buffs and ocean-lovers everywhere!

Got questions? Contact Edward Murphy, Heal the Bay’s Watershed Education Manager and Stoked on the Coast program coordinator.

Stoked on the Coast Student Film Festival



Feeling a bit spacey today?

Well, have we got an offer for you – a chance to hitch a ride to outer space.

Through a unique partnership with the Urgency Network and the charitable foundation of the rock band Incubus, Heal the Bay supporters have a chance to do what only 500 or so people have ever done before – enter the final frontier and see the surface of the Earth from a spaceship cockpit.

Safely ensconced in a Lynx Mark II, you’ll have a thrill of a lifetime breaking the sound barrier and being thrust into space from a launch pad in the Caribbean island of Curaçao. Reaching the apogee at 100km, you’ll float in silent, pitch-black darkness for a few minutes before descending back to Earth and gliding home.

Going to space has long been the domain of governments, but private space adventure travel has literally taken off. Now you have the chance to hit infinity and beyond. The good news is that you don’t have to be a millionaire to get there.

By donating now to Heal the Bay, you will be automatically entered into a contest to win a seat on the very first Space Expedition Corp. spaceflight, scheduled for late 2015. For every $10 donated to Heal the Bay at the Urgency Network website, you’ll get 50 entries into the sweepstakes, which is being promoted by three dozen other nonprofits as well. The more you give, the greater your chance of becoming an official astronaut. You can win additional entries by completing tasks like signing petitions or sharing the opportunity on Facebook and Twitter.

The contest ends July 21, so start your G-force training now. Whether it’s the land or the ocean, a better planet begins with a better perspective. See you in space!



You know climate change is a global issue, right? But do you have any idea about what its specific impacts may be on the L.A. shoreline in the coming years? Are you curious how sea level rise may affect the Los Angeles coast? Is your favorite beach or neighborhood hangout subject to dangerous flooding?

Well, you can learn more by attending a workshop organized by Heal the Bay, the Venice Neighborhood Council, USC Sea Grant, and Los Angeles City Council District 11 to learn more about this important issue at our Venice Ocean Forum this Wednesday evening.

Venice, San Pedro, and Wilmington are some of the most vulnerable local communities to flooding, according to a recent USC Sea Grant study examining sea level rise impacts for coastal communities in the City of Los Angeles. Based on 100-year sea level rise projections, some studies suggest flooding throughout much of Venice.  Sea level rise in Los Angeles may reach 5.6 feet by 2100, which may be further exacerbated by high tides and storm surge – especially when big wave events occur at or near seasonal peak high tides, or King Tides.

 At the Venice Ocean Forum experts will discuss the risks associated with climate change in Venice, and ways that communities can work together to help adapt to impacts. We’ll also talk about how other communities in the greater L.A. area are preparing to meet the specific local challenges posed by global warming. The forum is open to the public. The meeting begins 6:30pm at Westminster Elementary and food will be provided. So please RSVP today.



Heal the Bay president Ruskin Hartley says it’s time to stop flushing billions of gallons of water into the Bay.

I’d been living in Los Angeles for about six months when a three-day storm hit back in February. I had begun to wonder what all the fuss was about stormwater. Could it really be that bad? Now I know the answer is yes — but not just for the pollution it causes.

I was delighted by the waterfalls that popped up in Topanga Canyon. I was saddened to see the torrent of trash flowing down Chautauqua into the ocean. But what really shocked me was when I learned that the three-day storm, in the middle of an historic drought, flushed enough water into the ocean to meet the needs of our region for one-quarter of a year. That’s crazy.

At a time when cities in Northern California face rationing, and farms in the Central Valley lie fallow, we are flushing billions of gallons of water into the ocean. That same water is causing huge environmental problems because of the trash, pathogens, and toxins it carries. There must be a better way.

Fortunately, there is. There is a growing consensus across the region that stormwater is not just a pollutant, but a valuable source of water. Stormwater capture projects, when done well, deliver water quality benefits, water supply benefits, and bring much needed green space into our city. It is true that stormwater capture is not a panacea for our supply needs. But it is an important part of a portfolio of projects to increase local water reliability that includes water conservation, water recycling, and groundwater cleanup. Today we import 90 percent of our water from more than 100 miles away. At the same time, we dump 350 million gallons a day of treated effluent into the Santa Monica Bay from the Hyperion Treatment Plant, and discharge billions of gallons of polluted stormwater into the bay every time it rains. It’s past time to bring these three separate systems together and focus on an approach to integrated water in our region.

There is some great work underway throughout the region to do this and to deal with stormwater pollution. For example, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s Stormwater Capture Master Plan currently in development is looking at infiltration systems built into city streets and improved spreading grounds to refill our groundwater supplies. Countywide, projects are being developed under the MS4 permit to capture and clean up stormwater. More is needed to integrate these projects and look across agency jurisdictions, but that’s not the biggest challenge. What is missing is funding.

In November 2004, voters in the City of Los Angeles approved Proposition O — the Clean Water, Ocean, River, Beach and Bay measure — with an overwhelming yes vote. In the past decade, Prop O has funded dozens of projects, including the restoration of Echo Park Lake and installation of thousands of trash capture devices in storm drains. But as of January 2014, almost $492 million of the $500 million bond was obligated. These projects are helping to get us on track, but there is much more to be done. Without new funding, the rivers, creeks and beaches throughout our region will continue to be polluted.

With the increased consciousness caused by the drought, now is the time for some bold moves. We call on the state legislature to move a water bond that prioritizes investments in local water, including stormwater capture, water recycling, and groundwater cleanup. While they are at it, California lawmakers need to pass reforms that enable municipalities to more easily raise fees for stormwater cleanup. Why should stormwater projects have a higher bar than water supply or refuse pickup? At the local level, we call on our political leaders to prioritize funding for local water, either as stand-alone or part of other infrastructure measures. Potholes may be an annoyance, but water is literally life and death. And at the community level, we encourage everyone to do their part by conserving potable water and capturing stormwater through rain barrels and rain gardens. Become informed about where your water comes from.

It’s an exciting time to be working on water in our region. Join us and be a part of the future of Los Angeles.



Who would’ve thought you could make an environmental statement by sipping a cold one? This Saturday, April 26ordering a Heal the Bay IPA is one way to support a clean and healthy ocean. Thanks to Golden Road Brewing in Los Angeles for bringing back this ale and for donating a portion of the sales to us. Saturday a handful of the neighbors around our Santa Monica Pier Aquarium will pour this seasonal ale to benefit Heal the Bay. So come on out to help clean the beach and participate in our Earth Day activities, which include a massive beach cleanup and sandcastle building competiton. And when you get thirsty, continue to give back by having a Heal the Bay IPA in one of these nearby establishments:

And a special thanks goes out to Kaiser Permanente for supporting clean beaches by becoming a Corporate Healer!



Are you drawn to good design? Love the beach? Well, we’ve got a great opportunity for you to proudly show you care. Heal the Bay has commissioned two of L.A.’s most celebrated graphic artists to power a new fashion-forward campaign announced just in time for Earth Day, this April 22.

Hoping to inspire a new generation of local ocean lovers, Tim Biskup and Florencio Zavala created limited-edition T-shirts that celebrate the diversity of greater L.A. and the wonders of its shorelines. Heal the Bay, which has a long history of collaborating with local artists like Catherine Opie and Ed Massey, asked Zavala and Biskup to conceive and donate original artwork that inspires people to take action to protect our local beaches.

Limited Edition T-Shirts Designed by local artists Tim Biskup and Florencio Zavala

Biskup, a Santa Monica native who employs vibrant color and playful forms in the pop-design genre, created a whimsical showcase of the many animals that lurk beneath the Bay and call it home. Zavala, a creative director who worked side by side with artist Shepard Fairey for nearly a decade, crafted an image that speaks to his long-standing interest in street culture and evokes Southern California’s rich Pan-American history.

“I practically lived in the water when I was a kid growing up in Malibu,” said Biskup. “Anyone who wants to make it a cleaner, nicer, safer place is alright in my book!” Added Zavala: “When Heal the Bay approached me recently about creating a limited-edition tee graphic, I couldn’t help but smile. As a South Florida native and now Angeleno, the sea and sand are defining elements of my identity. The ocean and everything beneath its surface is precious.”

The limited run of t-shirts is now available at ZJ Boarding House, the surf apparel and equipment retailer on Santa Monica’s Main Street, and at Channel Islands Scuba, while supplies last.