Top

Heal the Bay Blog

Category: News

Mar. 9, 2016 — South Bay surfers have long been some of Heal the Bay’s most passionate supporters. They are our eyes and ears in the water after all. We’ve been lucky to add another very capable surfer to our lineup – Bruna Schmitz, a world-class athlete, beautiful model and one of the nicest people you’ll ever meet.

Born in Brazil, Bruna joined the ASP as a teenager and has now segued into a role as a spokesperson for Roxy Sports and other lifestyle brands. She travels the world, both on business and looking for good surf. But when she’s back home in Hermosa Beach she serves as a community ambassador for Heal the Bay, spreading the word to her nearly half-million online fans. Communications Director Matthew King recently caught up with Bruna during a lull in the action.

Where’s your favorite spot to surf in L.A.? Pro surfer Bruna Schmitz (r) and Heal the Bay board member Kari Boiler at Coastal Cleanup Day
I love surfing around the South Bay. It’s always a little adventure searching for the best spots around.

What’s the best spot to grab a bite after a surf session in L.A.?
We surf a lot down in Manhattan Beach so it’s an easy walk to Four Daughters or North End. They have delicious yummy breakfasts. But a personal favorite is The Source Cafe in Hermosa Beach.

Do you think most surfers here in L.A. think about water quality before they get in the water?
I’m sure they think about it on some level, but that doesn’t stop them when the waves are good. Even if there is a bad report for that day, you’ll notice surfers in the water. Surfers, I think, are uniquely positioned to educate the general public about what they see out there.

What’s the scariest moment you’ve had in the ocean?
I’m pretty used to feeling scared when I break my board or get held under the water for too long, but being in the water in a sharky spot is definitely the worst.

Why do you think surfing is such a hot cultural trend now? It’s everywhere – music, fashion, TV.
It’s a lifestyle, a workout, everyone loves the beach, so what’s not to love about surfing, hee-hee. It also makes me really happy, so I assume it makes everyone else happy too.

What’s the biggest misconception people have about pro surfers?
That it’s not really a job or a career.

What’s the biggest misconception people have about Brazilians?
That we are all loud and not polite.

You’re getting married soon. Is that going to help or hurt your surfing?
Well my fiancé Dane Zaun is a surfer, too, so I don’t see how that would hurt. We love traveling and going on surf trips together, so that’s a big plus!

What do you like about Heal the Bay?
The awesome efforts to keep our ocean and beach clean, caring for our sea life, and the reports on everything ocean-related in Santa Monica Bay. Since becoming an ambassador, I’ve gained so much education about something near and dear to my heart.

You hear about all the challenges the ocean is facing – plastic pollution, climate change, overfishing, oil spills. Do you think there’s a way to stay positive?
I think you need to always stay positive and hope for the best. I’m so thankful for organizations like Heal the Bay for keeping us positive and for working so hard to actually reverse all these challenges. You guys rock.

What would you tell people to do if they are worried about how we are treating our beaches and oceans?
To go online and learn more about the work Heal the Bay does on making sure everyone has the chance to enjoy a clean beach and ocean. From there, awareness can lead to action. That’s how I got involved! We need everyone’s help. Not just those closest to the coast.

You can follow more of Bruna’s adventures at brunaslife.com or or via instagram @BrunaSschmitz

Bruna Schmitz in Fiji with Roxy

Image courtesy of Bruna Schmitz

 



March 8, 2015 — Heal the Bay has spent the past 18 months working with a coalition of local environmental groups building a case for the implementation of so-called “Living Streets” in the city of L.A. In a nutshell, we need to a better job of building streets that are green, cool and complete. James Alamillo, our urban programs manager, took the lead on creating an economic analysis that demonstrates that building environmentally friendly streets that do such things as capture and infiltrate stormwater provides 75% more benefits to society than usual street projects.

The purpose of this document is to provide elected leaders, city staff, advocates and community members with information and resources to accelerate development of “Living Streets” in Los Angeles as a strategy to adapt to a changing climate and make the city more livable and resilient.

Our streets are arterials that touch and connect every neighborhood in Los Angeles. They span the length of the city and are utilized by everyone. Because of this, there are arguably no other infrastructure projects that can have a greater impact on the health and environment of an urban area like L.A. For most of the city’s history our streets have been built largely with the sole purpose of servicing the automobile. It’s time for a new perspective. It’s no longer acceptable to build roads the way we did in 1950; we must start building the streets of 2050 and beyond. Those new streets should be Living Streets.

Below are links to PDFs of the just-completed work Heal the Bay has been conducting with the city of L.A. to make our region more resilient and livable:

Living Streets Guide

Living Streets Executive Summary

Policy Recommendations for Implementing Living Streets

Living Streets Economic Feasibility Study 

Heal the Bay Partners

Green L.A. Coaltion is a volunteer-run network of organizations and advocates working on local water issues facing the City of Los Angeles and our region. Stephanie Taylor and Holly Harper, formerly staff of Green LA Coalition, worked on this Living Streets project.

Climate Resolve is a Los Angeles based climate change advocacy organization dedicated to creating real, practical solutions to meet the climate challenge while creating a better Southern California today and in the future.

Acknowledgements

The authors of the report would like to thank the numerous people who assisted in this endeavor by contributing their time and energy reviewing the docment and providing insightful feedback to make it a stronger document.

Grant Team

James Alamillo, Heal the Bay; David Fink, Climate Resolve; Holly Harper, North East Trees; Meredith McCarthy, Heal the Bay; Stephanie Taylor, Green LA Coalition; Evyan Borgnis, California Coastal Conservancy

Peer Review Team

Mark Gold, UCLA; Madeline Brozen, UCLA; Monobina Mukherjee, UCLA; Rebecca Drayse, LASAN/One Water LA Team; Rita Kampalath, Heal the Bay; Mike Antos, CSUN; Carolyn Casavan, Casavan Consulting; Jessica Meany, Investing in Place; Wing K. Tam P.E., City of Los Angeles

Supporting Individuals

Melanie Winter, The River Project; Johnathan Perisho, The River Project; Jeff Newman, CalTrans; Richard Watson, Richard Watson & Associates, Inc.; Andy Lipkis, Tree People; Mike Sullivan, Los Angeles County Sanitation District; Dave Snider, Los Angeles County Sanitation District; Paul Herzog, Surfrider; Derek Wieske, City of Long Beach; Anthony Arevalo, City of Long Beach; Taejin Moon, Los Angeles County; Bruce Hamamoto, Los Angeles County; Allen Sheth, City of Santa Monica



June 14, 2016 — Students at Cal State L.A. have been sharing their observations with us about the plague of plastic pollution. Here’s a report from the Eastside, penned by students of Lollie Ragana, an English professor on campus. In the coming days, we will publish a few of our favorites.

BRIGIDO AYON

Plastic is part of our daily lives. But the use of plastic has come to haunt us, as it is part of the huge amount of trash we throw away. In the Los Angeles area alone, “10 metric tons of plastic fragments—like grocery bags, straws and soda bottles—are carried into the Pacific Ocean every day,” according to Ecowatch.

I commute to school at Cal State L.A. and in order to get to my destination I must take the freeway as it is much faster, at times, and more direct. Most of the time I have to deal with bumper-to-bumper traffic. As I am slowly making my way to school, I wonder about and recognize a lot of trash lying on the side of the freeway and on the on/off ramps.

As I pay closer attention to the highway, I realize that most of the trash is plastic or contains parts of plastic. “On average in Southern California alone Caltrans picks up about 50,000 cubic yards of trash on our freeways,” according to a recent ABC News report, with three quarters of that trash being plastic in nature. We as consumers need to be educated about the use of plastic and the realization that plastic does not go away. Nearly 50% of the plastic we use, we use just once and throw away, according to Ecowatch. This shows that we pay little attention to the amount of plastic we use and throw away after one single use.

One of the off-ramps that I mainly use is covered with plastic trash and also has a fence that has a lot of the trash pinned up against it.  At times I put my windows down to get some fresh air, but instead I receive a hideous smell that I believe comes from all the trash on the off-ramp. The worst part is after a rainfall, like the few we’ve experienced recently, which makes the trash smell worse and gives off a moist, garbage-disposal stink.

As a daily commuter, I feel that most people in my community aren’t aware of the amount of plastic trash that ends up in this one spot alone. I have asked other friends who use the off-ramp if they have noticed the trash when exiting and most of them respond with a surprised gesture. They feel that it’s too difficult to pay attention to the trash when driving. But I feel as if they are afraid to admit that there is a huge plastic trash problem surrounding that area.

I feel that certain steps need to be done in order to change the off-ramp from a plastic dump to a clean area. One of the steps is to put up posters and signs in order to make the people aware of the amount of plastic being thrown near the off-ramp. Once the signs are posted, volunteers can help clean up the trash and dispose of it properly. Also, we can have community seminars where we present the dangers of using plastic and the proper way to dispose of it. This will help open up the eyes of many which will then lead to the contribution of cleaning many other areas common to the off-ramp.

The highways and the off-ramp need to be cleaned by the community because of how bad it looks and the awful smell it gives off. In the end, I want to be able to drive through the off-ramp and be satisfied with its appearance and not have to have my windows rolled up when I pass through the area.

 

MARIA ARAUJO

Our problem is that we don’t know the problem. Most of you have been to a beach, or at the least, passed by one. Isn’t it just nearly the perfect view? The perfect evening can also instantly turn into an uncomfortable situation, as you may not be able to properly walk on the polluted sand. Most of the things found on beaches are single use products such as water bottles, straws, fast food wrappings, and even personal belongings. The majority of the things that are found on the beach are made up of plastic. According to Katie Allen, an education director from Algalita Marine Research and Education, “recently, a team of researchers from six countries calculated that an astounding 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic weighing 269,000 tons can be found floating in the global ocean”.  As part of the environment, we should be aware of how much we are actually affecting not only the oceans, but also the marine animals, with our waste. I don’t believe that many of us have a clear understanding of how plastic actually works.

So first — what is plastic? Is there really ever an “away” for plastic?

Many of us may assume it disappears the instant that we throw it away, but the answer is no, plastic never goes away. As far as our understanding for the disposal of our waste goes, we have grown to the idea that by throwing something away we are getting rid of it forever. Now, if you think about it, most of the trash found in the oceans comes from storm drains, which is the same trash we dispose of. When it rains all the trash that goes into the storm drains eventually end up not only in piles of polluted trash, but also floating in the ocean. The real question is, how much can plastic waste damage our environment?

All the plastic waste that ends up floating above or beneath our waters break down into smaller pieces as time goes by. For example, a simple water bottle can end up decomposing into hundreds of little pieces and that doesn’t mean it has finally gone away. It has simply changed its form.

Several marine animals tend to swim with an open mouth in order to consume their food or what they think may be a food source. Since there are millions of tiny plastic pieces floating around, many of them tend to mistake this plastic as food or even as other marine animals. Once the smaller fish eat those plastic pieces, and are eaten by bigger fish and so forth, those plastic pieces become part of the food chain. If the fish are not eaten by their predators, they die due to the inability to digest plastic.

Recently, I’ve learned about something known as The Great Pacific Garbage Patch. As stated by an online source, “The gyre has actually given birth to two large masses of ever-accumulating trash, known as the Western and Eastern Pacific Garbage Patches, sometimes collectively called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.”  It is said to be about twice as big as the size of Texas.

Can you imagine the millions of tons of waste that will never go away? As mentioned in a Los Angeles Times article, “Nearly 90% of floating marine litter is plastic.” That is an immense amount of plastic waste that continues to increase as greatly as our consumption.

To prevent and even reduce the high percentage of waste in our oceans, we can cut back the use of plastic. We can do things like avoid the use of single use plastic bags, switch our water bottles for reusable steel bottles, or consider changing your home appliances for the ones that are considered to be environment safe. Even spreading awareness of the situation can help create a positive impact for our environment.

It is essential for us to know what we are being exposed to and how safe we maintain the environment because what may affect us today can affect our generations yet to come. Overall, we can get a pretty clear idea of how dangerous pollution, specifically plastic pollution can be by knowing how much plastic pollution is actually affecting our environment. Remember, we are a part of the marine food chain. The birds and fish we see lying dead with plastic pieces in their stomach, could be us lying with toxic chemicals, sooner than you think.

 

JONATHEN HERNANDEZ

“I can’t wait to go and explore the world!” I used to always tell myself that as I looked out the window and just saw more and more concrete buildings and cars whooshing by. With the window open I could feel the wind hit my face and I just wondered how the wind felt in Europe, or in the Arctic, or even in the middle of the ocean. Alas, those were only child dreams. Even if I kept those dreams alive, they would eventually hurt me; the world isn’t the same as it used to be back in 2000.

Isn’t it fascinating how we say: “Back in 2000” like it’s already been over 50 years? That’s how far the world has come in 16 years, back when everything was relatively cleaner than it used to be. There is only one thing you can blame for the toxins that riddle our drinking water, our food, our oceans, our planet — greed. Looking back at my childhood after cleaning up Dockweiler Beach, it made me look at the world in a different way.

As a little kid I used to love to go to the beach and play in the water, but I had a traumatic experience one time that kept me out of the water. In a way, after learning all that I know about the toxins in the ocean and pollution, I’m thankful I was scarred from almost drowning at the beach at the age of 8. I can only imagine what could be in my system that I picked up from 8 years in the beach water, but I know it’s significantly less than if I had been in the ocean water for 18 years.

I have someone in my life whom I hold dear to my life, and she likes to play in the water at the beach, but, unfortunately, my fiancee can no longer play in the water because I fear for her safety. I thought government regulated places such as beaches would be safe from this hazard, but I was wrong. I now realize it takes more than the government, it takes voices, not just from one person, but from the 7 billion people in this world. We cannot live any longer in this toxic planet. We’re killing ourselves and we need to come together and spread our concern to everyone because if we don’t, we have two paths: The path to death, or the path to redemption.

 

JESUS HARO

I volunteered on April 17, 2016 in my first beach clean-up at Dockwielder Beach for about two hours. From 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. I picked up plastic and any harmful products in the beach that can hurt the animals in the sea. The beach clean-up included my classmates from my English class.

I wasn’t expecting to see as much plastic and trash as I did that day. I was amazed by how much plastic and trash there was lying on the sand from people enjoying their day at the beach and leaving personal things behind. Also, the numerous over-flooded trash cans caught my attention quickly.

The plastic items lying around the over-flooded trash cans showed the trash cans are not changed frequently. All trash cans should be changed more frequently to prevent the trash cans from overflowing. Changing the trash cans can be a huge help in decreasing the amount of plastic and trash left on all the beaches, not just Dockwielder Beach. It’s obvious people do not throw away their trash because of the over-flooded trash cans, nor they do they want to take their trash with them.

Volunteering in the beach clean-up was my first eye opener about the environment. It made me realize how the people ahurt the environment — not just the environment of us humans, but for the animals in the sea as well. Eventually, the plastic and trash in the sand will find its way to the ocean water. Sea animals are not clever enough to know it’s plastic, so they tend to swallow plastic. Plastic is a major cause of  sea animals’ death around the world. It has been a problem since plastic was created.

As for myself, I didn’t know much about how plastic is hurting us and the sea animals around the world. My environmental eye opener began in my college English class about a month ago. Many of my classmates have said they weren’t aware of how bad plastic was for the environment. Having discussions about plastic during class sessions has made me aware of the plastic around me.

Target employees volunteer to clean up the beach

The beach clean-up changed my views on the environment because it made me realize how small pieces of plastics and trash can make a beach look bad. Throwing those small pieces of trash and plastics into a trash can make a massive difference.

Being able to experience and be a part of a beach clean-up, plus knowing the amount of plastic and trash we picked up as a team, made me feel great! Even though we did not make a dramatic change by cleaning up for two hours, it was a great feeling knowing I was a part of a team.

I encourage others to volunteer in beach clean-ups and other programs improving the environment. It’s a good way to help the environment we live and breathe in, also the sea animals’ environment. Having people volunteering in beach clean-ups is a great way to make the beaches look nice and clean again and save sea animals.

 

VALERIA TEMBLADOR

My favorite place to go that allows me to forget about all my problems is Seal Beach. I love walking down the pier passing by all the local shops. With each step that I take, a variety of food aromas sweep me off my feet.  I continue to get closer and closer to the beach. Just smelling the sea salt, hearing the waves crash, and the sand running through my toes makes it the most beautiful and soothing place to go. However, this soothing place is not so beautiful when you examine it closer. Seal Beach is one of the many contributors to the pollution that is found in our waters.

Every time I walk on the pier, I see small pieces of trash that get swept away by the wind. However, I was never bothered by it because I never saw the harm, especially from small pieces of trash, until the beach clean up assignment. The cleanup made me realizes we have a major issue on our hands. In our oceans, “ there are 5.25 trillion pieces of plastic debris,” according to the National Geographic. All the trash we do not pick up gets pushed closer and closer to our waters.

If we continue to neglect the trash from piers or even boardwalks it will eventually come back to us. All we care for is the fun the pier provides, the food, the music, and just having fun in the sand. As of right now many of us do not take action because it has not affected us drastically. Why are we waiting for the damage to get worse? Animals are not the only ones affected by the trash; so are we. The oxygen, which we breathe, will not be as fresh and the water we drink will not be drinkable. So, why are we waiting? We need to start making changes in our communities that are near water. We need to start taking action now before it’s too late.

In order to minimize waste on the Seal Beach Pier, numerous trash cans should be placed all around the pier. However, just simply adding trashcans and placing them all around the pier is not enough. These trashcans get overfilled and they should be replaced hourly to avoid trash falling, which will eventually get blown to the beach. Another way of keeping our beaches clean is having oceanographers hold seminars in order to educate us on how our trash is affecting our water. Lastly, having people volunteer to do beach clean ups weekly will maintain our beaches.

The way we dispose of our trash so freely needs to be recognized before it’s to late. In the end, I want to be able to walk on the pier without fearing that the trash I dispose of will end up in the water. I want my happy place to be beautiful and soothing, not just for me, but also for everyone that enjoys the connection that the pier has with the people.

 

YVETTE CASTILLO

What’s that smell? As I glanced down the street pavement I quickly got my answer.

A powerful, protruding odor was coming out of a small cigarette butt that was left lying on the street pavement. As I slowly picked up the cigarette and made my way to the nearest trash bin, I began to see more and more cigarette butts on the concrete pavement

LA natives are constantly on the go and it is highly common for one to be on the go and see thousands of cigarette butts left behind by cigarette users. On a bad day one can see a whole pavement covered with cigarette butts.

An average smoker consumes about two packs of cigarettes a day according to no-smoke.org, making it extremely easy for one to misplace and leave the cigarette butts unattended. Leaving the unattended cigarette butts can lead to many negative and unpleasant ailments from pedestrians to inhale the second hand smoke to many animals in taking and eating the cigarette butts.

After seeing documentaries and hearing a speaker from Heal the Bay talk about the dangers of unattended waste, I am aware of the negative consequences that it has not only on human but also to wildlife. However, it was not until I saw a bird trying to eat leftover cigarette butts that it hit a nerve within me.

It is bad enough that unattended cigarettes butts release toxic chemicals into our air, but to see a bird mistake unattended cigarette butts for food was extremely shocking to me. Knowing that the cigarettes are harmful and seeing personally the effect it has on the birds has made me become an advocate for picking up waste such as cigarette butts.

Although one does not have to be a pedestrian to care about this issue, one has a reason to be concerned due to the fact that the toxic pollutants negatively affects wildlife and our lives as well By living in a very populated city such as Los Angeles, we have a high probability of leaving unattended waste such as cigarettes.

Los Angeles County now has the opportunity to address the problem, such as by increasing the number of cigarette bins so anyone can discard their cigarettes without leaving them on the street . By adding more cigarette bins on streets we can make a huge impact on reducing the amount of cigarettes found on local streets.

Although many will disagree with adding more cigarette bins due to the increase in taxes, the ends will justify the means. By paying a little more in taxes for the cigarette bins, we will reduce the number of deaths within wildlife and lower human medical bills. Therefore, it is highly important that one writes to their nearest representative in order to address this problem

Let’s start saving our lives and wildlife by disposing properly of our cigarette butts.

 

ANA MENDOZA

(Ana wrote a note to a local bag manufacturing plant. It’s printed here.)

Superior Plastic and Paper Bags

1930 E 65th St.

Los Angeles, CA 90001

Dear Mr. Penhashian,

Hello, Mr. Penhashian, my name is Ana Mendoza. I am currently a student at California State University of Los Angeles. The reason I am writing to you is because, in my English class, we are learning about the environment. One of the things that caught my attention is how plastic bags are being thrown out into the streets after being used and are then being washed into the oceans. In order to help the environment, I ask for your help to stop producing any type of plastic and instead produce reusable bags.

After experiencing a beach clean-up, I was able to see how plastic bags are harming our beaches and streets. You might not know what animals in the ocean are going through, but if you were to go to the beach you would become aware of what harm plastic bags are causing.

One of the things I would suggest you to do is to think about, instead of creating plastic bags, making recyclable bags so that people can continue to use them after buying their groceries instead of just throwing them into trash cans and the wind blowing them away into the streets.

According to an article called“The Great Plastic Tide”: “While doing simple walk in the coast line of the beach you can see how there are tiny plastics in the sand.” After reading this statement it made me think about all the animals in the oceans that are being killed because they are eating plastic. Another article in The New York Times talks about how fish in the North Pacific ingest up to 12,000 to 24,000 ton of plastic. After reading this article what caught my attention the most was how fish in the ocean are being killed due to all the plastic there is. I also began to think about how one small change can save hundreds of fish in the sea.

The reason I am against plastic bags is because any hunting mammal that is in the ocean can mistake the plastic bags for a meal and find its airway cut off. The more plastic bags are created the more deaths of mammals are being caused and the deaths by plastic bags are increasing every year.

If you were to start producing reusable bags and explain to your workers why you will not be producing plastic bags anymore I am sure that your workers will also become concerned and they  will start to understand that plastic bags are causing harm. If you were to start producing reusable bags, your company will help save the environment. Your company will produce more bags because more store owners are becoming aware of the harm plastic bags are causing and are looking for companies that are beginning to produce reusable bags.

After being able to show you the harm that plastic bags and other objects are causing to fish, I ask for you to stop producing plastic because it might not be harming you right now but in a few years more and more animals will be dying.

Thank you for your time and I hope to hear from you soon in regards to creating reusable bags.

Sincerely,

Ana Mendoza

Thanks to English professor Lollie Ragana for sharing these insights with us.



Feb. 22, 2016 — Most people have no idea there’s a plan afoot to build L.A.’s first desal plant. Staff scientist Steven Johnson reports on building opposition to the proposal.

Want to know where the real action is in Manhattan Beach on a Tuesday night? Hint: It’s not popular bars like Shellback or Sharkeez. No, the real hot spot is the Manhattan Beach City Hall. It’s where you could find me and my Heal the Bay wingman Jose Bacallao last Tuesday night, speaking out against the building of an ill-advised desalination plant on the South Bay shoreline.

Very few Angelenos – let alone Manhattanites – have any idea that the West Basin Municipal Water District wants to construct a massive desalination plant on the beach near the El Segundo-Manhattan Beach border. The district hopes to release in June its Environmental Impact Report for the project, which would be the first full-fledged desal plant in Los Angeles County.

Digital rendering of desalination plant, courtesy of West Basin Municipal Water District

 

 

While we are waiting to see the analysis within the EIR, Heal the Bay has concerns that this is simply the wrong project, at the wrong time, in the wrong place. The $300 million plant aims to convert up to 60 million gallons of seawater a day into drinking water for the 17 cities the agency serves.

Besides our obvious concerns about the plant literally sucking the life out of the ocean, we worry about West Basin wasting a lot of time, energy and ratepayer money.

Why build a costly desal plant before fully exploring more efficient infrastructure options like water recycling and stormwater capture?

Though the EIR isn’t due until June, the council put the discussion item about the proposed plant on the agenda to begin formal public discourse about the sure-to-be controversial project. You’d expect Heal the Bay to be worried about desalination, but some other powerful opponents to the proposed project also lent their voice to the debate Tuesday night.

Manhattan Beach Mayor Mark Burton described the proposed plant as “a giant step backward in our commitment to getting the Santa Monica Bay back to its natural state.” Hermosa Beach Mayor Pro Tem Hany Fangary also lent his voice of dissent. Craig Cadwallader, a longtime Heal the Bay ally and driving force at the South Bay chapter of the Surfrider Foundation, also urged West Basin to more fully explore recycling infrastructure before embarking on a costly desal plan.

Bacallao, the senior aquarist at our Santa Monica Bay Aquarium, and I spoke during public comments. We reminded attendees that ocean desalination is bad for the wallet, marine life, and the future of our coastlines.

After spirited discussion, the Manhattan Beach City Council voted 5-0 to approve a letter to West Basin Municipal Water District opposing the project and listing the city’s specific objections.

The action is largely symbolic, as council does not have any regulatory control over the project being built. (Ultimately, the California Coastal Commission and other state agencies would have to approve the project.)

But Mayor Burton and his peers expressed their desire to voice their concerns early to West Basin’s board of directors while the plant is still in the planning stage. They made it clear that they view the plant as blight on their shorelines, one that would further degrade a marine environment already challenged by nearby industrial impacts. The thought is that enough public pressure might convince the agency to shelve the plan in favor of other water supply options.

Driving home, I thought about the potential appeal of desalination. Strange times, brought on by the scary thought of drought, often bring extreme solutions. Like a shipwrecked crew in a lifeboat terrified of dehydration, some Southern California communities have looked to seawater desalination as an easy way to slake their thirst.

With Southern California importing 80% of its water, it’s understandable why a local water agency would want to become more self-sufficient. West Basin says on its website that the plant could provide “local control of water without the threat of . . . being cut off from the supply.”

Sounds reasonable, right?

Well, speaking as someone not in the lifeboat, I’d suggest to West Basin that there’s water all around them. West Basin is already adjacent to a plentiful source of Proposed location of plant, between El Segundo and Manhattan Beachwater — the City  of Los Angeles’ Hyperion Water Reclamation Plant, which currently provides West Basin with 40 million gallons of highly treated recycled water each day.

West Basin already has plans to nearly double the water recycling effort to create 70 million gallons of recycled water by 2020. It seems strange that West Basin wants to add a mere 10% to their current water portfolio by jumping into costly and risky desalination—commonly considered a last resort for water-starved communities by everyone from the country of Israel to the chair of Yale University’s Chemical Engineering department. Especially when even more water than what they have projected could be sourced from Hyperion.

Millions of dollars have already gone into scoping this standalone desal plant. That money would have been better spent creating a comprehensive blueprint about how Hyperion and West Basin could better align their interests to dramatically ramp up shared water recycling. (You can read more about the potential of water recycling and stormwater capture here.)

Yes, getting two separate municipal agencies to work together is messy and can be complicated. But too often politics and control-issues trump common sense. West Basin is seeking an autonomous water future, but at what cost?

Because it’s so energy intensive, desalination is not only the most expensive option for drinking water, it also has the potential to put the most carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, aggravating climate change.

Adding to the environmental issues, West Basin’s analyses at this point show that subsurface seawater intake valves appear infeasible at their proposed plant location, forcing the use of exposed, open-ocean intake valves. This means sucking millions of gallons out of the open ocean environment each day, a concept that is completely out-of-step with Heal the Bay’s mission to protect the marine environment.

Not only do open-ocean water intake valves vacuum up fish larvae, the final by-product of desalination is a double-salty toxic brine. That slurry is diffused back out into the ocean, creating a second detrimental impact on marine life. (You can read more about our top 5 concerns with desal here.)

Before jumping into desal, West Basin might learn from other agencies’ mistakes.

San Diego has recently built the Pacific’s largest desalination plant in Carlsbad. Just one month after city officials ceremoniously cut the tape on the plant, city water suppliers in February had to dump more than 500 million gallons of perfectly (and expensively) good drinking water into the Lower Otay Reservoir, near Chula Vista.

Sounds crazy, right?

Tanner and Jasper Ford drink recycled water during a tour of West Basin’s Edward C. Little Water Recycling Facility

Under its contract with desal operator Poseidon Resources, the San Diego County Water Authority must buy a certain quota of desalinated water produced by the plant. The only problem is that San Diegans, responding to the Governor’s pleas to conserve during the drought, are doing too good a job of cutting back. San Diego now has more water than it needs. With an overabundance of water supply, San Diego is creating its own scenario from “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice.”

Heal the Bay applauds the Manhattan Beach City Council for speaking out about West Basin’s proposed desalination plant and bringing awareness to a situation that has received scant public attention.

We would also like to commend West Basin for their leadership and innovation over their almost 70-year history. They have been a good partner with Heal the Bay and they should be lauded for their efforts on water conservation and current recycling program.

We respectfully encourage West Basin to fully explore expanding their current water recycling programs rather than chase the unicorn of a desal plant.

Heightened water recycling with Hyperion is the most responsible way to increase West Basin’s water supply. It’s also a common-sense initiative that would win very broad support – unlike desal.

Perhaps sometime in the future, we’ll all reconvene for another Tuesday night at the Manhattan Beach City Council watering hole. We can toast the future with a crystal-clear, purified glass of recycled water.

In the meantime, we promise to keep you posted and alert you about opportunities for the public to weigh in on this matter.

Join our mailing list to stay up-to-date on important regional issues like desalination.



Feb. 16, 2016 — Matthew King, Heal the Bay’s communications director, peers into the dirty laundry at Loews Hotel. When it comes to a more sustainable L.A., he likes what he sees. 

“What’s good for the environment is good for business.”

It’s a saying I often throw around the office when crafting talking points for various Heal the Bay initiatives. But it’s great to see those words put into action locally, as I did Tuesday morning during a tour of the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel.

I joined a few journalists on a junket arranged by the city of Santa Monica to highlight innovative stormwater capture and water recycling projects in our town. We stopped at Loews because the hotel has implemented an effective program to reduce its water use via recycling.

As one of the bigger commercial water users in Santa Monica, Loews worked with city officials to conduct an audit of how the hotel used water each year and how the business could manage it more efficiently. Guests are doing a better job of reusing towels and not demanding new sheets each morning, but laundry still remains the biggest user of water on the property, according to the hotel’s spokeswoman, Rachel Kaye.

So last year the hotel installed an onsite, closed-loop system to recycle 70% of the water used each day for laundry. Using ultraviolet technology, the system disinfects laundry wastewater during the final rinse cycle. That cleansed water is then pumped back to start the wash cycle of subsequent loads. Because that water is already heated from the previous cycle, the system requires far less energy than conventional washing.

In all, Loews has reduced its overall annual water use by 22% by installing the system – some 4.3 million gallons a year. They also reduced their energy consumption related to laundry by more than 50%.

Buoyed by that success, Loews is in the middle of installing low-flow showerheads, toilets and faucets in its 347 guest rooms, with a goal of reducing in-room water use by more than 40%, according to Kaye. She says surveys of guests who have stayed in the rooms that have already been converted don’t indicate any concerns with the changes.

Economic forces drive change in our society, so it’s encouraging to see Loews saving on energy and water costs. The switch to recycled water and low-flow infrastructure will surely benefit their bottom line and shareholders, which will serve as an incentive for further changes. But most important (to us), the switch will benefit the local environment. Businesses like Loews have the scale and visibility to hopefully nudge other companies sitting on the sustainability fence.

Before Loews, the city’s Neal Shapiro took us to a few other stops. The operations and maintenance center for the new Metro light-rail network near Centinela Boulevard has installed a 400,000 gallon cistern that will capture stormwater runoff from local stormdrains. The water will be reused for irrigation of the grounds and to clean equipment at the site. At our next stop, I learned that the city of Santa Monica has also received a $1 million grant to tap into the city of L.A.’s massive stormwater collection cistern underneath Penmar Park, which is located near the border of Santa Monica and Venice. A pipeline will carry reclaimed water to irrigate Santa Monica’s Marine Park, which is located less than a mile away.

The media tour, capably organized by the city’s Andrew Basmajian and PR whiz Julie Du Brow, served as context for today’s unveiling of a multiagency-shaped roadmap for scaling up alternative water supplies in L.A. County. Heal the Bay and partner NGOs helped announce the roadmap – dubbed Matrix 2.0 – at a ceremony today at the Pico Library in Santa Monica.

Matrix 2.0 provides legal and practical guidelines on how individuals, businesses, cities and other entities can use rainwater, graywater, stormwater and so-called blackwater to gain better water self-sufficiency.

The rules will help simplify the regulatory patchwork involved in trying to get recycling and capture systems installed and approved in our region.

The document took months of work by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, City of Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation and the City of Santa Monica Office of Sustainability and the Environment. The backbone of L.A’s environmental movement – TreePeople, the Natural Resources Defense Council and Heal the Bay – also helped shape the final product. Kudos to all! You can see the new guidelines here.

Hopefully these guidelines will spur companies and municipalities to follow in the footsteps of Loews and the city of Santa Monica. With the L.A. region still importing 80% of its water, it’s time to get shovels in the dirt – not just study proposals and prepare PowerPoints.

Terri Williams, L.A. County’s Acting Director of Environmental Health, signs the Matrix 2.0 guidelines. HtB’s Rita Kampalath (2nd from left) looks on. Loews Santa Monice Beach Hotel’s Rachel Kaye discusses the benefits of its water recycling system with members of the local media.


In a 7-5 vote, the California Coastal Commission voted today to dismiss its embattled executive director, Dr. Charles Lester, despite a tremendous outpouring of public support for his stewardship. Here is Heal the Bay’s official statement about the ousting of the longtime leader and champion of environmental protection.

Heal the Bay is discouraged and disappointed by the decision made by the Coastal Commission today to terminate Dr. Charles Lester as its Executive Director. His firing is representative of a larger issue about the future of California’s coastline. The vote raises the question of what the Coastal Commission’s vision is for California’s coast, and how it diverges from Dr. Lester’s performance record of fostering collaboration, providing the public a voice, moving projects and policies forward along our coast, and upholding the Coastal Act.

Dr. Lester’s collaborative spirit led to the passage of several important policies and projects by the Coastal Commission, including the Santa Monica Mountains Local Coastal Plan and California’s first sea-level rise policy providing guidance to coastal communities about how to prepare for climate change.

We are grateful for the large outpouring of support from the public for Dr. Lester and the Coastal Act, a law poignantly referred to in public comment today as “the Constitution of our shores.” Unfortunately, the voice of the public was not heard, despite the thousands of people that rallied behind Dr. Lester encouraging the Commission to maintain his position.

The Coastal Commission received an impressive 28,000+ support letters from the public, a statement from over 150 Coastal Commission staff supporting Dr. Lester in the position of Executive Director, and over 1,600 signatures on a Heal the Bay-initiated petition supporting his tenure. Rita Kampalath, Heal the Bay’s Science and Policy Director, presented these petitions at the hearing in Morro Bay today and spoke eloquently in his defense.

In losing Dr. Lester’s leadership, Heal the Bay fears that several important projects will stall at the Commission, including the development of Local Coastal Plans for Santa Monica, Venice, and Hermosa Beach. We are also concerned that that the loss of his decades of institutional knowledge will negatively impact the functionality of the Coastal Commission and its staff. There is trepidation that transition at the leadership level could open up the Coastal Commission to pressures from development and erode Coastal Act implementation.

Regardless of today’s disappointing action, Heal the Bay will continue to track the Coastal Commission, and advocate for improvement on issues that this process has brought to light, like transparency in Coastal Commission decision-making.

We expect the new Executive Director to maintain a collaborative working relationship with Heal the Bay and other stakeholders in the same style as Dr. Lester, and work quickly to address pressing issues that face our coast — such as sea-level rise, climate change, and coastal access for all.

Thank you to all our community members who expressed their concerns directly to the Commission over the past few weeks. We will remain vigilant.



Feb. 05, 2016 — Staff watershed scientist Katherine Pease bugs out about our major legal victory in Malibu Creek.

In May 2013, I stood in front of a packed meeting room in Agoura Hills, filled with West Valley residents concerned about rumors of rate increases from their local water district. My job was to convince them to care about aquatic bugs as much as their water bills. Needless to say, I faced an uphill battle.

Well, two years later, I’m proud to say that the bugs won.

This week a federal court upheld pollution reduction requirements created by the EPA – and informed by data collected by Heal the Bay scientists – to protect creatures both large and small in impaired Malibu Creek.

Back in 2013, the federal EPA established a formal Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) – basically a numeric pollution reduction requirement – to address the fact that Malibu Creek, some of its major tributaries, and Malibu Lagoon had very poor or impaired biological communities.

Katherine Pease at Malibu CreekBiological communities in streams are assessed through the different types and numbers of aquatic bugs (or benthic macroinvertebrates) that live there. Think of snails, worms, crayfish, and larval stages of dragonflies, damselflies, black flies, and mayflies. Which brings us back to why we or anyone should care about bugs.

Benthic macroinvertebrates are relatively stationary, ubiquitous, and they show a diversity of responses to stressors, making them an ideal indicator group of biological health. The biological condition of a stream tells a meaningful and comprehensive story of the condition of the stream’s water quality and habitat. A stream’s benthic macroinvertebrate community provides insights into its ecology, incorporating the effects of many factors that are difficult or impossible to replicate in a laboratory setting.

In essence, these bugs are an excellent indicator for the overall vibrancy of the stream.

For example, is the stream filled with only bugs that can tolerate polluted water? Or, is there a diversity of bugs that are sensitive to pollution in the creek? Healthy streams mean healthy watersheds, and healthy watersheds mean healthy cities.

The TMDL identified two main factors impairing the biological communities: high levels of nutrients and sediment. EPA came to that conclusion after completing a careful scientific analysis of water quality and biological data from the Malibu Creek Watershed.

One of the major sources of data came from Heal the Bay’s Stream Team. Since its inception in 1998, Heal the Bay citizen science volunteers and staff have been collecting water quality data monthly and conducting biological assessments yearly (since 2000) in the Malibu Creek Watershed.

These data helped to identify specific problems with the biological community and their sources. Sediment and nutrients both create poor habitat for aquatic bugs. Sediment blankets the stream bottoms, choking out prime habitat and diversity. Nutrients like phosphorous and nitrogen cause excess algal growth, which also can impair stream bottoms. (You can read more about these challenges and our proposed solutions in our detailed study here.)

The Tapia Water Reclamation Plant, which treats wastewater and discharges the treated water to Malibu Creek, has been a significant source of nutrients to Malibu Creek. While the effluent generally meets a high standard and contains low bacteria counts, the treated water still contains high levels of nutrients, specifically nitrogen and phosphorus.

The operators of the Tapia plant (the Las Virgenes-Triunfo Joint Powers Authority or JPA) objected to the new pollution limits and sued EPA to nullify the TMDL in the fall of 2013. As part of its challenge, the JPA questioned EPA and Heal the Bay’s science. They also argued that the costs of lowering nutrient levels in treated wastewater would be excessive. Because of the importance of the TMDL, Heal the Bay and our environmental partners NRDC and LA Waterkeeper intervened in the lawsuit, supporting the EPA.

We are very happy to report that this week that the TMDL has been upheld in court, thanks to good science and strong legal representation by NRDC.

We stand behind the science informing this important pollution limit, and we are proud that Stream Team data contributed to this process, which will ultimately improve the water quality and biological communities of our local streams and lagoons.

While the financial costs of protecting local streams need to be weighed carefully, we also need to weigh the environmental costs of not acting to preserve healthy watersheds – and what that means for water quality and wildlife that use the streams, including humans.

We should be creative in thinking about our water future, and how water quality and water supply are connected. In this time of drought, there are financially and environmentally strong investments in technology, like water recycling, which will reduce discharge to creeks, clean up water pollution, and help enhance our local water supplies.

Thankfully, the JPA is evaluating increasing water recycling as an option for the future health of Malibu Creek and local residents. This win is also a reminder that even though they may seem small and insignificant, aquatic bugs loom large. They tell us important information – like whether you can drink the water in your local stream, swim in it or eat the fish in it – if we just pay attention.

Photograph of the author courtesy of the Ventura County Star



In today’s guest blog post, Santa Monica College student Yasi Razban examines how local cities are preparing to take advantage of much-needed rain.

Feb. 3, 2016 — El Niño 2016 has arrived but much of the rain water that Southern Californians were hoping would ease the water crisis has gone to waste.

Heavy downpours earlier this year saw almost an inch and a half of rain falling at LAX – a new daily record. And this is just the beginning – warmer than usual ocean temperatures mean this El Niño is set to top the big one of 1997.

“An average 1-inch of rain from a storm can create about 1 billion gallons of runoff in L.A. County stormdrains. That’s about 120 Rose Bowls’ worth of dirty water that goes into the ocean,” says Dana Murray, Heal the Bay’s Senior Coastal Policy Manager.

Seems criminal for a state suffering through a five-year drought, that when much needed rain finally comes, it gurgles into stormdrains and heads straight out to sea. Especially as this El Niño is predicted to dump most of its precipitation in Southern California.

This exposes our biggest infrastructure problem.

Murray says 75 percent of California’s water storage infrastructure is located north of Fresno. Los Angeles County designed a stor water drainage system back in the 1930s built specifically to cope with our Mediterranean climate where rain falls almost exclusively during the winter. The end result is almost continuous paved-over surfaces from the mountains and foothills rimming L.A. County, through city streets to the beaches, creating what’s essentially a big concrete bowl tilted towards the ocean. What seemed like great planning then isn’t doing us any favors now.

The prolonged drought means every drop of available water counts so California is scrambling to realign its approach to water management on almost every level. Los Angelenos have gotten their daily water use down to 106 gallons per person. Orange County has a state of the art waste-water recycling plant. And there is serious consideration of costly desalination plants as a way to increase the water supply for our parched state.

The city of Santa Monica is aiming for water self sufficiency by 2020. An ambitious goal which is noteworthy because it relies heavily on catching 182.5 million gallons of rainwater per year before it runs into the ocean.

Here’s how they plan on doing it: Tanks will be installed to collect urban runoff and storm water that would otherwise flow off the Third Street Promenade area and city streets through storm drains into the ocean. One tank will be just north of the Santa Monica Pier in the Deauville Parking lot, a second will be installed adjacent to the City’s existing Civic Center, and a third will be at the City’s Memorial Park (14th Street and Olympic).

These tanks will connect to the Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility (SMURRF) unit, where the water gets treated and then used for street cleaning, irrigation, and flushing toilets. Creating a local water supply while at the same time stopping all that bacteria laden untreated water from entering the ocean is good news for the health of Santa Monica Bay.

While the tanks won’t be in place for this El Niño, there are other water-saving projects going on in the county.

“We saved 400 million gallons of water from the beginning of El Niño with spreading grounds diverted throughout LA County,” states an LA Public Works official.

These water conservation facilities are located in areas where underlying soils are permeable enough for water to percolate into, then connect to an aquifer. However, this doesn’t get us out of the woods. Even though it’s hoped this El Niño will temporarily relieve drought effects, it’s too unpredictable of a force to be depended on to save us and its intensity may be dangerous if we don’t figure out the water situation.

“El Niño occurs about every 7 years alongside southern oscillation – the change of atmospheric pressure along the eastern and western Pacific,” says Murray. “A decrease in atmospheric pressure over the eastern Pacific leads to a decrease in the westward blowing trade winds towards the equator, which in turn allows warmer waters to travel east and north to the southwestern U.S. coastline.”

Warmer ocean temperatures exacerbate storms and this month’s record ocean temperatures – nearly 4 degrees warmer than average – are expected to give an additional boost to El Niño 2016, which will likely persist throughout spring. Warmer air temperatures intensify storms because warmer air holds more moisture.

This is where climate change comes into the picture – increased atmospheric carbon dioxide has driven overall global air temperature up by one degree already and ocean temperature is up too because a third of the excess heat has been absorbed by the ocean. Then there’s sea-level rise caused by climate change which leads to coastal erosion where we lose wetlands and swamps – the areas that can buffer the effects of a storm. All of the above can intensify an El Niño storm system resulting in “King” tides, storm surges, and flooding.

El Niño rain is going to affect some areas more harshly than others. Past El Niño have resulted in mudslides, erosion, and flooding. Homes in areas known to be at risk of mudslides will be the hardest hit, along with houses built on mountainsides or hills. Neighborhoods near L.A. stormdrains that have been clogged with trash and debris can also experience flooding. Intense and weird weather is predicted to be the new norm.

Places like California will experience more drought and intense El Niños, so we need to be prepared for all these possibilities. In the coming months, it will be important for the state and its residents to be more proactive with water on an individual and large-scale level. Whether it’s installing rain barrels at homes, or investing in local and state water-saving projects, it’s time to think of other ways to recycle water – and quick.

Local environmental champion and journalist Belinda Waymouth contributed to this report.



Heal the Bay got its start as an all-volunteer organization in 1985, birthed in the Westwood living room of founding president Dorothy Green. Since then, Heal the Bay has matured into one of Southern California’s most effective environmental organizations, fueled by science, advocacy, community engagement, and education.

To ensure that we remain focused and that our day-to-day work aligns closely with our key goals, we recently completed a new strategic plan, thanks to a grant provided by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Here’s an (admittedly) detailed look at how we are organizing ourselves and our efforts over the next five years.

The following goals define our committment to improving the health and sustainability of greater L.A.:

  • To better protect public health, we will work to ensure that people can swim and fish at every beach in L.A. County without risk of getting sick.
  • To ensure a more sustainable water future, we will work to ensure that L.A. County sources 60% of its water locally through conservation and reuse by 2025. 
  • To restore the vibrancy of our local ocean and watersheds, we will work to ensure that all greater L.A. coastal and river habitats are healthy.

To achieve these goals, we have aligned our work around three key pillars: thriving oceans, healthy watersheds, and smart water management.

Thriving Oceans

The Santa Monica Bay and L.A.’s coastal waters have changed dramatically since Heal the Bay was founded in 1985. In the 1980s it was not uncommon for people to suffer illness from swimming at the beach. And, wildlife like brown pelicans and dolphins were a rare site in the Bay. The health of our Bay has come a long way, thanks to the largest wastewater treatment plan in L.A. – Hyperion – upgrading to advanced secondary treatment and the establishment of several Marine Protected Areas off our coast (both projects that Heal the Bay helped advance). But many dangers loom, from offshore oil drilling to plastic pollution. As L.A.’s local water watchdog, Heal the Bay staff and volunteers work hard to:

  • Restore, enhance, and protect ocean and coastal habitats, so that they are filled with life. You can help Heal the Bay’s staff scientists by joining our MPA Watch community-science program. We also work closely with researchers and agencies to evaluate climate change impacts to Southern California coastal environments and help coastal communities adapt to these changes.
  • Safeguard local coastal waters from pollution, while playing a watchdog role to protect against emerging threats. Stormwater is the biggest source of pollution to the Santa Monica Bay. With runoff comes all sorts of urban slobber – bacteria, motor oil, pesticides, trash, and other pollutants. Heal the Bay staff continue to fight against plastic pollution through education and proactive policies to protect aquatic life from confusing trash as food or becoming entangled in plastic that pollutes local waters.
  • Ensure that seafood caught for consumption in Santa Monica Bay is safe to eat. DDT- and PCB-laden runoff and wastewater discharged from the Montrose Chemical Corp. and other Southland-based industries from the 1940s-80s have resulted in a large swath of contaminated sediments off the coast of Palos Verdes. Since 2002, Heal the Bay staff have been educating anglers at piers throughout Los Angeles about what fish are safe to eat and which ones they should avoid. We are also working with researchers and agencies to better understand these pollution problems and advocate for clean-up and remediation.
  • Improve public knowledge about our local coast and ocean, and empower people to help protect them. Heal the Bay educates nearly 200,000 people each year through both formal and informal education programs. Come experience the Bay at our Santa Monica Pier Aquarium and learn more about local wildlife. Or, join us for a monthly beach clean-up to learn about pollution and help keep trash from entering our local waterways.

Healthy Watersheds

Watersheds are areas of land that drain to common waterbodies – such as the Santa Monica Bay or the L.A. River. We all live in a specific watershed (there are 8 of them in L.A. County), and we all share responsibility for protecting the living water body it drains to. Waterways throughout greater L.A. are threatened by armoring, pollution, development in riparian habitat, flood control maintenance, and invasive species, among a host of other impacts. Heal the Bay is conducting research to better understand negative impacts to our watersheds and educating and mobilizing citizens to protect them. To achieve our goals, we need to:

  • Understand the current health of watersheds in L.A. County. In order to protect local watersheds, we have to know what is threatening the habitat, water quality, and aquatic life. Heal the Bay partners with researchers, NGOs, and volunteers to study these threats, including programs like our citizen science supported Stream Team. Once threats are identified, Heal the Bay works to advance policies, projects, and education to improve watershed health.
  • Connect communities to their rivers, streams, and wetlands. Hundreds of miles of rivers and streams throughout greater L.A. are paved with concrete channels. Although they may help with flood control, the viaducts serve as a barrier to the public. Many Angelenos don’t even know these channels are actually rivers. The few natural streams and rivers that exist here are havens for birds and plants. Through our urban education and outreach programs, Heal the Bay helps connect communities to local streams and waterways, so they can learn about the threats, see the benefits of watershed health, and help advocate for enhancement of their natural and built environment.
  • Advocate for enhancement and protection of riparian corridors and wetlands. Heal the Bay staff advocate before local and state agencies in an effort to pass policies and shape programs to enhance rivers and wetlands. Our work helped lead to the restoration of Malibu Lagoon in 2013, and there are new opportunities for the largest wetland restoration in the L.A. region with Ballona Wetlands.
  • Enhance public understanding about watershed health, and empower people to help protect it. Heal the Bay education and outreach staff work through a variety of programs to inform people about watershed health. Come check out the watershed exhibit at our Santa Monica Pier Aquarium, which features the tidewater goby, a federally endangered fish that inhabits local estuaries.

Smart Water Management

The record drought, coupled with climate change and other stressors, has called into question the practicality of importing nearly 90% of L.A.’s water supply. Continued reliance on imported water is an uncertain and dangerous proposition. We need to be smarter about using the water that we already have, which will benefit both local water supply and water quality. Here’s what we vow to do to advance more sustainable local water:

  • Ensure that beaches and waterways are safe for swimming. Millions of people visit California beaches each year, and no one should get sick from a day at the beach. That’s why Heal the Bay has been grading beaches on our Beach Report Card for over 20 years on an A-F scale to inform beachgoers about what beaches are clean for swimming and which ones to avoid. We also work with local and state government to find ways to clean up dirty beaches in the region. And we’re piloting a program with Stanford University to start forecasting water quality at historically troubled beaches.
  • Protect water quality throughout the region. Stormwater, or urban runoff, is the largest source of pollution to the Santa Monica Bay. By fighting for strong pollution limits and water quality regulations, Heal the Bay helps make sure local governments, industrial and commercial entities are accountable for their stormwater. Cleaning up local waterways benefits both people and aquatic life.
  • Improve the rate of water recycling. Each day wastewater treatment plants uselessly send hundreds of millions of gallons of highly treated wastewater into local rivers and the Pacific Ocean. Only a small percentage is recycled for industrial uses or irrigation. If more wastewater was treated to a higher standard, it could be recycled and substantially reduce the region’s reliance on imported water and simultaneously bolster regional water supplies. We continue to advocate for more projects and funding support to increase water recycling throughout the region.
  • Advance greater stormwater capture and reuse. Each day roughly 10 million gallons of urban runoff flows through L.A County stormdrains, picking up pollutants and eventually reaching the ocean without the benefit of any treatment. On a rainy day, that volume can escalate to 10 billion gallons. Our science and policy team is working to ensure stormwater management planning and implementation includes multi-benefit solutions that improve greenspace, beautify communities, and capture water onsite for reuse or recharging groundwater. This includes working with state and local governments to find creative ways to fund stormwater programs.
  • Advocate for alternatives to desalination. It’s a common suggestion to turn to the ocean as a water source in water scarce times. Many people don’t realize that desalination is an energy-intensive, inefficient technology that threatens marine life. Heal the Bay is working to advance conservation and expansion of local water sources, such as stormwater cleansing and reuse, and wastewater recycling to avoid turning to desalination.
  • Create greater public understanding about water quality and supply, and empower people to advocate for a cleaner and more reliable water future. Where does our water come from? Especially in a large region like greater L.A.? If you’re feeling sheepish that you don’t know the answer, most Angelenos don’t either. Heal the Bay educators will be working with partners through our new “Dropping Knowledge” community-outreach project to educate Angelenos in Korean, Spanish, and English about how to maximize local water. We can’t expect people to be part of the solution to our water woes if they don’t understand the problem.

As you can see, we’ve got our work cut out for us. If you’d like to make a contribution toward a cleaner ocean and healthier L.A., please click below.

Support Heal the Bay's work  



Jan. 1, 2016 — Here’s an early look at some of the key issues we will be tracking in the coming year. If we are to be successful, we need your support. 

Ballona Wetlands Restoration

The Issue: The Ballona Wetlands Ecological Reserve is nearly 600 acres of open space between LAX and Marina del Rey. A historically thriving wetland, it has suffered decades of degradation from development, dumping of sediments, disconnection from creek flows, and assault from invasive plants.

What’s at Stake: Approximately 95% of Southern California’s wetlands have been lost. Much of the remaining wetland habitat in our densely urbanized region is highly degraded. With the proposed Ballona Wetlands restoration project, we have the opportunity to restore natural function at one of L.A.’s largest wetlands.

Why we are focused on it: Wetlands provide nursery, shelter, and feeding grounds for fish and wildlife. They purify water through filtration of pollutants, recycle nutrients, and help buffer against impacts associated with climate change. Restoring ecological function at Ballona will not only benefit our local environment, but also serve as a place for public education and enjoyment.

Next steps: The Department of Fish and Wildlife will be releasing a draft environmental impact report this winter, analyzing several options for restoring Ballona Wetlands. Heal the Bay staff scientists will review the report and provide public guidance and recommendations.

 

Plastic Bag Referendum

The Issue: In 2014, California became the first state in the nation to enact plastic bag ban legislation through SB 270, which prohibits grocery stores, convenience stores, and pharmacies from distributing free single-use plastic bags, and requires stores to charge a minimum of 10 cents for paper and reusable bags. Looking to protect its profits, Big Plastic is pouring millions of dollars into an effort to undo the historic ban through a ballot initiative in November 2016.

What’s at stake: Plastic bags, designed only to be used for minutes, commonly make their way into streams, rivers, and oceans, where they never truly degrade. Plastic pollution can kill wildlife that mistake it for food or become entangled in it. Plastic bags are also a costly nuisance: California spends an estimated $25 million a year to collect and dispose of discarded plastic bags, according to CalRecycle.

Why we are focused on it: Plastic bags have become a gateway issue in the nation, compelling people to think about how their consumer habits can affect the environment. This common-sense ban not only saves money and the ocean, it has led to positive behavior change for millions of Californians. We can’t go back now.

Next steps: Californians will vote on the future of the plastic bag ban at the polls on November 8’s general election. You can help by pledging to vote YES on Prop 67!

 

Smarter Water Management

The Issue: The record drought, coupled with climate change and other stressors, has called into question the practicality of importing nearly 90% of L.A.’s water supply from other regions. Continued reliance on imported water is an uncertain and dangerous proposition. Instead, our region needs to be smarter about maximizing the water that we already have.

What’s at Stake Each day roughly 10 million gallons of urban runoff flows through L.A. County stormdrains, picking up pollutants and carrying them to the ocean without the benefit of any treatment. On a rainy day that number escalates to nearly 10 billion gallons of water, and associated urban slobber, flowing to the sea. Even on a dry day, wastewater treatment plants needlessly send hundreds of millions of gallons of highly treated and usable water into local rivers and the Pacific Ocean.

Why we are focused on it: Beneficially reusing this water through wastewater recycling and stormwater capture and reuse serves two benefits – building local water resiliency and cleaning up our local waterways. If we are smarter about reusing local water, we can also avoid turning to the ocean for a water source through desalination, which is costly, energy intensive, and threatens sea life.

Next steps: Our policy team is working to ensure stormwater management includes multi-benefit solutions that improve greenspace, beautify communities, and capture water onsite for reuse or recharging groundwater. We are also working with state and local governments to find creative ways to fund projects and programs to reuse and recycle stormwater and wastewater.

 

We have a lot of work to do in 2016, but contributions from ocean-lovers like you can make it happen.

Make a year-end donation to Heal the Bay